5 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Oodygreen2 sentences2007See Oody, 823 S.W.2d at 560 ; State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn. Crim. 2005See Oody, 823 S.W.2d at 560 ; State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Turnbillgreen2 sentences2007See Oody, 823 S.W.2d at 560 ; State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn. Crim. 2005See Oody, 823 S.W.2d at 560 ; State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr., A/K/A \Ice Cream\" and \"Mugsy\""green2 sentences2010In United States v. Haydel, the United States Court of A ppeals for the Fifth Circu it articulated a seven-factor analysis applicable to the standing inquiry. 649 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir. 1981). 2005This court has adopted the seven-factor test enunciated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir. 1981), for determining whether an individual has exhibited an actual, subjective expectation of privacy and, therefore, has “standing” to contest a search or seizure. | 1 | 3 |
Concord Enterprises Of Knoxville, Inc. v. Commissioner Of Tennessee Department of Labor & Workforce Developmentgreen1 sentence2021“In other words, if the [business] fail[s] to meet any one of the guidelines contained in T.C.A. § 50-7-207(e)(1) [i.e., the ABC test], the [workers] will be found to be employees and the business must pay an employment tax.”9 Beare Co., 814 S.W.2d at 719 ; see also Concord Enterprises, 524 S.W.3d at 234 (affirming the trial court’s judgment where the trial court confined its analysis to the ABC test and found that test to be dispositive, stating, “Although the Petitioner asserts it fits the definition of independent contractor under the seven-factor test of Tennessee common law, the Petitione | 1 | 1 |
State v. Woodsgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982); see also State v. Oody, 823 S.W.2d 554, 560 (Tenn.Crim.App.1991); State v. Woods, 806 S.W.2d 205, 208 (Tenn.Crim.App.1990). 2001See State v. Turnbill, 640 S.W.2d 40, 46 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982); see also State v. Oody, 823 S.W.2d 554, 560 (Tenn.Crim.App.1991); State v. Woods, 806 S.W.2d 205, 208 (Tenn.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beare Co. v. State
green
1 sentence2021“In other words, if the [business] fail[s] to meet any one of the guidelines contained in T.C.A. § 50-7-207(e)(1) [i.e., the ABC test], the [workers] will be found to be employees and the business must pay an employment tax.”9 Beare Co., 814 S.W.2d at 719 ; see also Concord Enterprises, 524 S.W.3d at 234 (affirming the trial court’s judgment where the trial court confined its analysis to the ABC test and found that test to be dispositive, stating, “Although the Petitioner asserts it fits the definition of independent contractor under the seven-factor test of Tennessee common law, the Petitione | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.