Sixth Amendment speedy trial analysis (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

Sixth Amendment speedy trial analysis in Tennessee

5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Graygreen
tenn · 1996 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See State v. Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 ; Pharm v. Hatcher, 984 F.2d at 786 n. 5.

1997See State v. Gray, 917 S.W.2d at 673 ; Pharm v. Hatcher, 984 F.2d at 786 n. 5.

22
State v. Utleygreen
tenn · 1997 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See State v. Utley, 956 S.W.2d 489, 495 (Tenn. 1997) (“Although Doggett may have relaxed the need for showing prejudice in relation to a sixth amendment speedy trial claim, it did not change the need to show actual prejudice in relation to a due process claim.”). - 10 - The State asserted in its brief that the Defendant waived the issue, and the Defendant has not responded to the waiver argument.

11
State v. Simmonsgreen
tenn · 2001 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016State v. Simmons, 54 S.W.3d 755, 758-59 (Tenn. 2001).

11
State v. Bishopgreen
tenn · 1973 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 (1972); Demetrius Dewayne Utley, --- U.S. ---, slip op. at 4-5; State v. Bishop, 493 S.W.2d 81, 83-84 (Tenn. 1973).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Barker v. Wingo green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

2010Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 (1972); Demetrius Dewayne Utley, --- U.S. ---, slip op. at 4-5; State v. Bishop, 493 S.W.2d 81, 83-84 (Tenn. 1973).

2010Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 (1972); Demetrius Dewayne Utley, --- U.S. ---, slip op. at 4-5; State v. Bishop, 493 S.W.2d 81, 83-84 (Tenn. 1973).

12010–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-101 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 13 (1999–2026) GA 7 (1995–2019) CA 6 (1985–2024) TX 6 (1996–2024) PA 6 (1984–2025) VI 6 (2010–2016) MD 5 (1984–2020) TN 5 (1997–2020) WA 4 (1979–2009) UT 4 (2022–2025) DC 4 (1994–2003) AZ 4 (1986–2023) NM 3 (1990–2019) KS 3 (2016–2020) NJ 3 (2003–2020) FL 3 (1982–2024) MO 3 (1985–2012) OR 3 (2006–2012) MS 3 (2003–2011) IL 2 (2007–2007) IA 2 (1996–1997) NY 2 (1978–1979) WI 2 (1997–2001) VA 2 (1997–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check