Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Akins
green
2 sentences2021In determining whether the presumption is overcome, the trial court “must view the totality of the circumstances, and not merely the juror’s self-serving claim of lack of partiality.” Id. - 33 - The State maintains that the Defendant waived this issue by failing to challenge Juror 26 at trial. 2021The State may rebut the presumption through evidence establishing the absence of “actual prejudice” or “actual partiality.” Akins, 867 S.W.2d at 357 . | 2 | 2015–2021 |
Illinois v. McArthur
green
2 sentences2001In other words, “[w]hen faced with special law enforcement needs, diminished expectations of privacy, minimal intrusions, or the like, ... certain general, or individual, circumstances may render a warrantless search or seizure reasonable.” McArthur, 531 U.S. at 330 , 121 S.Ct. at 949 . 2001In other words, “[w]hen faced with special law enforcement needs, diminished expectations of privacy, minimal intrusions, or the like, ... certain general, or individual, circumstances may render a warrantless search or seizure reasonable.” McArthur, 531 U.S. at 330 , 121 S.Ct. at 949 . | 2 | 2000–2001 |
Mincey v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2001However, the State may rebut the presumption if the search or seizure falls within one of several “ ‘specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” Mincey, 437 U.S. at 390 , 98 S.Ct. at 2412 . 2001However, the State may rebut the presumption if the search or seizure falls within one of several “ ‘specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” Mincey, 437 U.S. at 390 , 98 S.Ct. at 2412 . | 2 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Sparks
green
1 sentence1999Although these cases do not alter the well- settled principle that the State may rebut a claim of legal insanity solely through lay testimony, the opinions hold that such lay testimony “must be consistent with sanity and inconsistent with insanity.” Sparks, 891 S.W.2d at 616 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.