Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ealeygreen2 sentences2000For this proposition, we cited State v. Ealey, 959 S.W.2d 605, 611 (Tenn.Crim.App.1997), which held that Trusty analysis did not apply to sexual offenses. 2000For this proposition, we cited State v. Ealey, 959 S.W.2d 605, 611 (Tenn.Crim.App.1997), which held that Trusty analysis did not apply to sexual offenses. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Dominygreen2 sentences2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). 2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). | 2 | 2 |
Rounsaville v. Evattgreen1 sentence2000See, e.g., Rounsaville v. Evatt, 733 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.1987); State v. Kirkland, 696 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. Hodge, 695 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. McClennon, 669 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984); State v. Taylor, 661 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Burnsgreen2 sentences2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). 2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Trusty
red
2 sentences2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). 2000The Tennessee Supreme Court overruled State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996), in the case of State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472, 476-77 (Tenn. 1999), to the extent that Trusty recognized and allowed convictions for “lesser grade” offenses which were not lesser-included offenses under the statute for which the appellant was indicted.1 The supreme court replaced the Trusty analysis with a different test in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 467 (Tenn. 1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2000See, e.g., Rounsaville v. Evatt, 733 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.1987); State v. Kirkland, 696 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. Hodge, 695 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. McClennon, 669 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984); State v. Taylor, 661 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. McClennon
green
1 sentence2000See, e.g., Rounsaville v. Evatt, 733 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.1987); State v. Kirkland, 696 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. Hodge, 695 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. McClennon, 669 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984); State v. Taylor, 661 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Hodge
green
1 sentence2000See, e.g., Rounsaville v. Evatt, 733 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.1987); State v. Kirkland, 696 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. Hodge, 695 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. McClennon, 669 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984); State v. Taylor, 661 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Kirkland
green
1 sentence2000See, e.g., Rounsaville v. Evatt, 733 S.W.2d 506 (Tenn.1987); State v. Kirkland, 696 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. Hodge, 695 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.Crim.App.1985); State v. McClennon, 669 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn.Crim.App.1984); State v. Taylor, 661 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn.Crim.App.1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.