Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Education Agency v. Leepergreen2 sentences2015Until then, the agency's pronouncements regarding “law,” “policy,” and procedural “requirements” remain merely informal views, effective only upon and within the agency's internal management and organization. 9 See Leeper, 893 S.W.2d at 443 (state board of education resolution stating guidelines for school districts pending statutory revision); United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Oregon Transp. 1999Until then, the agency’s pronouncements regarding “law,” “policy,” and procedural “requirements” remain merely informal views, effective only upon and within the agency’s internal management and organization. 9 See Leeper, 893 S.W.2d at 443 (state board of education resolution stating guidelines for school districts pending statutory revision); United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Oregon Transp. | 3 | 3 |
City of Waco v. Texas Commission on Environmental Qualitygreen1 sentence2025Quality, 346 S.W.3d 781, 802 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011) reversed on other grounds, City of Waco, 413 S.W.3d 409 (Tex. 2013). 19 But although the affected person factors for entitlement to an administrative contested case hearing are based on standing principles, “there are also key differences” in the process and in the factors for making this determination. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. City of Waco
green
1 sentence2025Quality, 346 S.W.3d 781, 802 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011) reversed on other grounds, City of Waco, 413 S.W.3d 409 (Tex. 2013). 19 But although the affected person factors for entitlement to an administrative contested case hearing are based on standing principles, “there are also key differences” in the process and in the factors for making this determination. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
United Copper Industries, Inc. v. Grissom
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 806 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.