Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1938–1969 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Koepsel
green
2 sentences1969The result was a considerable broadening of the statute, especially the meaning of “grossly unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.” In Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Koepsel, 159 Tex. 479 , 322 S.W.2d 609, 614 , the Court stated: “The ‘refusal’ of the applications for writs of error by this Court in the Morse case in 1909 [Morse v. State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W. 446 ] and the Berry case in 1911 [Berry v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W. 631 ] did not, as today, necessarily have the effect of approving the opinion or reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals. 1969The result was a considerable broadening of the statute, especially the meaning of “grossly unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.” In Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Koepsel, 159 Tex. 479 , 322 S.W.2d 609, 614 , the Court stated: “The ‘refusal’ of the applications for writs of error by this Court in the Morse case in 1909 [Morse v. State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W. 446 ] and the Berry case in 1911 [Berry v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W. 631 ] did not, as today, necessarily have the effect of approving the opinion or reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Berry v. State
green
1 sentence1969The result was a considerable broadening of the statute, especially the meaning of “grossly unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.” In Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Koepsel, 159 Tex. 479 , 322 S.W.2d 609, 614 , the Court stated: “The ‘refusal’ of the applications for writs of error by this Court in the Morse case in 1909 [Morse v. State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W. 446 ] and the Berry case in 1911 [Berry v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W. 631 ] did not, as today, necessarily have the effect of approving the opinion or reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Morse v. Board of Medical Examiners
green
1 sentence1969The result was a considerable broadening of the statute, especially the meaning of “grossly unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.” In Texas State Board of Medical Examiners v. Koepsel, 159 Tex. 479 , 322 S.W.2d 609, 614 , the Court stated: “The ‘refusal’ of the applications for writs of error by this Court in the Morse case in 1909 [Morse v. State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W. 446 ] and the Berry case in 1911 [Berry v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W. 631 ] did not, as today, necessarily have the effect of approving the opinion or reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Acme Laundry Company v. Ford
green
2 sentences1966Burton & Co. v. Stasny, 223 S.W.2d 310 , Tex.Civ.App.1949, writ refused, and some subsequent opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, wherein this Court refused the applications for writs of error with the notation, “No Reversible Error”: Acme Laundry Co. v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 745 (1955) ; Crawford v. Given Bros., Tex.Civ. 1966Burton & Co. v. Stasny, 223 S.W.2d 310 , Tex.Civ.App.1949, writ refused, and some subsequent opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, wherein this Court refused the applications for writs of error with the notation, "No Reversible Error": Acme Laundry Co. v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 745 (1955); Crawford v. Given Bros., Tex.Civ. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Raeburn Ex Rel. Raeburn v. City of Houston
neutral
2 sentences1966App., 318 S.W.2d 123 (1958); and Raeburn v. City of Houston, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 488 (1961). 1966App., 318 S.W.2d 123 (1958); and Raeburn v. City of Houston, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 488 (1961). | 1 | 1966–1966 |
A. C. Burton Co. v. Stasny
green
2 sentences1966Burton & Co. v. Stasny, 223 S.W.2d 310 , Tex.Civ.App.1949, writ refused, and some subsequent opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, wherein this Court refused the applications for writs of error with the notation, “No Reversible Error”: Acme Laundry Co. v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 745 (1955) ; Crawford v. Given Bros., Tex.Civ. 1966Burton & Co. v. Stasny, 223 S.W.2d 310 , Tex.Civ.App.1949, writ refused, and some subsequent opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, wherein this Court refused the applications for writs of error with the notation, "No Reversible Error": Acme Laundry Co. v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 745 (1955); Crawford v. Given Bros., Tex.Civ. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Crawford v. Given Brothers
green
2 sentences1966App., 318 S.W.2d 123 (1958); and Raeburn v. City of Houston, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 488 (1961). 1966App., 318 S.W.2d 123 (1958); and Raeburn v. City of Houston, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 488 (1961). | 1 | 1966–1966 |
State v. Community Finance & Thrift Corporation
neutral
2 sentences1960On April 6, 1960, this Court, in an opinion by Associate Justice Gray, held Sec. 1(c) of Art. 1524a-l to be unconstitutional and void, and the cases, supra, are reported in 334 S.W.2d 559 and in 334 S.W.2d 569 , respectively, and the applications for writs of error are pending. 1960On April 6, 1960, this Court, in an opinion by Associate Justice Gray, held Sec. 1(c) of Art. 1524a-1 to be unconstitutional and void, and the cases, supra, are reported in 334 S.W.2d 559 and in 334 S.W.2d 569 , respectively, and the applications for writs of error are pending. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Dutchover v. Dutchover
green
2 sentences1960On April 6, 1960, this Court, in an opinion by Associate Justice Gray, held Sec. 1(c) of Art. 1524a-l to be unconstitutional and void, and the cases, supra, are reported in 334 S.W.2d 559 and in 334 S.W.2d 569 , respectively, and the applications for writs of error are pending. 1960On April 6, 1960, this Court, in an opinion by Associate Justice Gray, held Sec. 1(c) of Art. 1524a-1 to be unconstitutional and void, and the cases, supra, are reported in 334 S.W.2d 559 and in 334 S.W.2d 569 , respectively, and the applications for writs of error are pending. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Casualty Insurance Co. of California v. Salinas
green
1 sentence1960Criddel, II, their agents and' employees; are temporarily en joined from taking or causing to be taken, either directly or indirectly, any action for the calling or holding of any election of corporate officers or directors of Columbia General Life Insurance Company or from holding, participating in, or being a candidate for election in any such corporate election, pending a final determination of the applications for writs of error now pending in this Court and until the further order of this Court.* Order issued February 26, 1960. * Applications refused, no reversible error, March 4, 1960, t | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Tarrant County v. Prichard
green
1 sentence1938Also see Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 86 S.W.2d 826 ; Tarrant County v. Prichard, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1028 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |
&198tna Cas. Surety v. St.
green
1 sentence1938Also see Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 86 S.W.2d 826 ; Tarrant County v. Prichard, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1028 . | 1 | 1938–1938 |