Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clements v. Withersgreen2 sentences2020See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex. 1990), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Coinmach Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment, Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013) (“[M]ere unenforceability of a contract is not a defense to an action for tortious interference with its performance.”); Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. 1969) (a contract held to be unenforceable under the statute of frauds may nevertheless serve as the basis for a tortious-interference claim); see also Morlock, L.L.C. v. Bank of N.Y., 448 S.W.3d 514, 517 (Tex. App.—Hous 2009See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., Inc., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex.1990) (citing Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex.1969)). | 5 | 5 |
Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2020See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex. 1990), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Coinmach Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment, Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013) (“[M]ere unenforceability of a contract is not a defense to an action for tortious interference with its performance.”); Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. 1969) (a contract held to be unenforceable under the statute of frauds may nevertheless serve as the basis for a tortious-interference claim); see also Morlock, L.L.C. v. Bank of N.Y., 448 S.W.3d 514, 517 (Tex. App.—Hous 2009See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., Inc., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex.1990) (citing Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex.1969)). | 3 | 5 |
Coinmach Corp. F/K/A Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp.green1 sentence2020See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex. 1990), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Coinmach Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment, Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013) (“[M]ere unenforceability of a contract is not a defense to an action for tortious interference with its performance.”); Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. 1969) (a contract held to be unenforceable under the statute of frauds may nevertheless serve as the basis for a tortious-interference claim); see also Morlock, L.L.C. v. Bank of N.Y., 448 S.W.3d 514, 517 (Tex. App.—Hous | 1 | 1 |
Morlock, L.L.C. v. the Bank of New York, as Trustee on Behalf of the Certificate Holders of CWABS, Inc., Asset- Backed Certificates, Series 2004-13green1 sentence2020See Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Assocs., 793 S.W.2d 660, 664 (Tex. 1990), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Coinmach Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment, Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013) (“[M]ere unenforceability of a contract is not a defense to an action for tortious interference with its performance.”); Clements v. Withers, 437 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. 1969) (a contract held to be unenforceable under the statute of frauds may nevertheless serve as the basis for a tortious-interference claim); see also Morlock, L.L.C. v. Bank of N.Y., 448 S.W.3d 514, 517 (Tex. App.—Hous | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||