Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Charles P Curry & Jennifer Curry v. Harris County Appraisal Districtgreen2 sentences2015See id. 6 On the same day the Juvenile Court signed the disposition order, the Juvenile Court also signed a deferral order, stating that the State and R.A. both agreed that the court should defer its decision as to whether R.A. should be required to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62 until after R.A. had participated in or completed a sex-offender treatment program while on court-ordered probation. 2015See id. | 3 | 3 |
in Re B.R.H.green2 sentences2015See In re B.R.H., 426 S.W.3d at 166-68 . 2015See Tex. Family Code Ann. § 51.0412 ; In re B.R.H., 426 S.W.3d at 167 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Griggs v. Capitol MacHine Works, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019However, once the respondent successfully completes sex offender treatment, “the respondent is exempted from registration under this chapter unless a hearing under this subchapter [62.351] is held on motion of the prosecuting attorney, regardless of whether the respondent is 18 years of age or older, and the court determines the interests of the public require registration.” Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe v. Csl Plasma, Incorporated
green
1 sentence2019Id. art. 62.352(c). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.