Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. Chathagreen2 sentences2024According to the court of appeals, the “diligent-service requirement” fails all three “prongs.” It found “the first two prongs of the Chatha test” unsatisfied because the diligence requirement “ ‘is not found in the relevant statutory language’ of section 16.003(a) and it is not a ‘requirement’ of that statute.” Id. at 752 (quoting Chatha, 381 S.W.3d at 512 ). 2024According to the court of appeals, the “diligent-service requirement” fails all three “prongs.” It found “the first two prongs of the Chatha test” unsatisfied because the diligence requirement “ ‘is not found in the relevant statutory language’ of section 16.003(a) and it is not a ‘requirement’ of that statute.” Id. at 752 (quoting Chatha, 381 S.W.3d at 512 ). | 1 | 4 |
Prairie View a & M University v. Chathagreen2 sentences2012Prac. & Rem.Code § 51.014(a)(8), and the court of appeals affirmed, holding that the Ledbetter Act applies to claims brought under the TCHRA, and Chatha’s claim was therefore timely because she received a paycheck containing an alleged discriminatory amount within 180 days of the date she filed her complaint with the TWC. 317 S.W.3d 402, 404, 407 . 2012CODE § 51.014(a)(8), and the court of appeals affirmed, holding that the Ledbetter Act applies to claims brought under the TCHRA, and Chatha’s claim was therefore timely because she received a paycheck containing an alleged discriminatory amount within 180 days of the date she filed her complaint with the TWC. 317 S.W.3d 402, 404, 407 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||