Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas West End, Inc v. City of Dallas, Texas Historical Commissiongreen2 sentences2015Although acknowledging the existence of evidence that TCI had actual notice of some of the requirements for obtaining a demolition permit for buildings in the historic district, the court held that the City “presented no evidence that [TCI] was ever informed of the ordinance provisions themselves before the building was demolished.” 407 S.W.3d at 301 (emphasis added). 2015Although acknowledging the existence of evidence that TCI had actual notice of some of the requirements for obtaining a demolition permit for buildings in the historic district, the court held that the City “presented no evidence that [TCI] was ever informed of the ordinance provisions themselves before the building was demolished.” 407 S.W.3d at 301 (emphasis added). | 2 | 2 |
Bcca Appeal Group, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texasgreen1 sentence2022See BCCA Appeal Grp., Inc. v. City of Houston, 496 S.W.3d 1, 15 (Tex. 2016) (noting that remedies that are “cumulative” are “in addition to” other remedies that remain in force whether or not they are enforced). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Dallas v. Tci West End, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3 City of Dallas v. TCI West End, Inc., --- S.W.3d ---- (2015) 2015 WL 2147986 , 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 888 ordinance after it demolished the building, because “to bring it demolished the building in violation of the ordinance. itself into compliance with the ordinance after demolition, Although acknowledging the existence of evidence that TCI [TCI] would have to obtain approval from the Landmark had actual notice of some of the requirements for obtaining Commission before the demolition.” a demolition permit for buildings in the historic district, the 2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3 City of Dallas v. TCI West End, Inc., --- S.W.3d ---- (2015) 2015 WL 2147986 , 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 888 ordinance after it demolished the building, because “to bring it demolished the building in violation of the ordinance. itself into compliance with the ordinance after demolition, Although acknowledging the existence of evidence that TCI [TCI] would have to obtain approval from the Landmark had actual notice of some of the requirements for obtaining Commission before the demolition.” a demolition permit for buildings in the historic district, the | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Illinois Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1949In United States v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 303 U. S. 239 , suit was brought to recover a civil penalty for violation of a Federal statute requiring the periodical unloading of livestock in transit. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.