Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bryantgreen2 sentences2007See State v. Bryant, 161 S.W.3d 758, 760-61 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (recognizing that findings dictated into the record at the conclusion of a suppression hearing are entitled to the same consideration as written findings of fact and conclusions of law). 2007After making this assumption, the court of criminal appeals concluded that the State had not met its self-assumed burden in light of evidence that the trooper had given Erdman extra-statutory warnings that placed considerable psychological pressure on him. 3: See State v. Bryant , 161 S.W.3d 758, 760-61 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (recognizing that findings dictated into the record at the conclusion of a suppression hearing are entitled to the same consideration as written findings of fact and conclusions of law). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Montanez v. State
green
2 sentences2008Montanez 195 S.W.3d at 105 . 2008Montanez 195 S.W.3d at 105 . | 3 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.