5 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
HCBeck, Ltd. v. Ricegreen1 sentence2019However, neither Lawson’s argument nor the cases he cites explain why Lawson failed to raise the New York statute during the January 2012 arrearage proceeding. 5 apply the New York statute in this case. 3 Statutory construction is a question of law “which is reviewed de novo to ascertain and give effect to the Legislature’s intent.” HCBeck, Ltd. v. Rice, 284 S.W.3d 349, 352 (Tex. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Leegreen2 sentences2007Ex parte Watkins, 73 S.W.3d at 268 ; State v. Lee, 15 S.W.3d 921, 929 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (Keasler, J., concurring) (“If a verdict at trial necessarily includes the determination of an ultimate fact issue in the defendant’s favor, and if proof of that issue is necessary for the prosecution to convict the defendant in a subsequent proceeding, then the prosecution is estopped from relitigating that issue, and the defendant is acquitted of that offense.”). 2007Ex parte Watkins, 73 S.W.3d at 268 ; State v. Lee, 15 S.W.3d 921, 929 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Obergefell v. Hodges
green
2 sentences2019He claims to have raised a constitutionally based challenge because he argued at trial and on appeal that the trial court violated his constitutional right to equal protection by refusing to 2 Citing several cases, Lawson argues that, at the time of the January 2012 proceeding, he was not viewed as an equal in the eyes of the law because of his sexual orientation and that, because there have been significant changes in the law since 2012, primarily the legalization of homosexual marriage by Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015), his claims in this case are not limited by res judicata. 2019He claims to have raised a constitutionally based challenge because he argued at trial and on appeal that the trial court violated his constitutional right to equal protection by refusing to 2 Citing several cases, Lawson argues that, at the time of the January 2012 proceeding, he was not viewed as an equal in the eyes of the law because of his sexual orientation and that, because there have been significant changes in the law since 2012, primarily the legalization of homosexual marriage by Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015), his claims in this case are not limited by res judicata. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
green
2 sentences2017Page 33 of 35 137 S. Ct. 855, *883 ; 197 L. 2017Page 33 of 35 137 S. Ct. 855, *883 ; 197 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ashe v. Swenson
green
1 sentence2015Ashe, 397 U.S. at 443 , see. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ex Parte Watkins
green
2 sentences2007Ex parte Watkins, 73 S.W.3d at 268 ; State v. Lee, 15 S.W.3d 921, 929 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (Keasler, J., concurring) (“If a verdict at trial necessarily includes the determination of an ultimate fact issue in the defendant’s favor, and if proof of that issue is necessary for the prosecution to convict the defendant in a subsequent proceeding, then the prosecution is estopped from relitigating that issue, and the defendant is acquitted of that offense.”). 2007Ex parte Watkins, 73 S.W.3d at 268 ; State v. Lee, 15 S.W.3d 921, 929 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
United States v. Nixon
green
1 sentence1986In United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), the United States Supreme Court recognized a constitutionally based privilege protecting from discovery confidential communications between high government officials, in particular the president, and their immediate advisors. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.