Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Pasadena v. Smithgreen2 sentences2013GOV’T CODE ANN. § 143.057(j) (West 2008). “[A] hearing examiner exceeds his jurisdiction when his acts are not authorized by the [Fire Fighters and Police Officers Civil Service] Act or are contrary to it, or when they invade the policy-setting realm protected by the nondelegation doctrine.” City of Pasadena, 292 S.W.3d at 21 . “[A]sserting that a decision made by a hearing examiner is incorrect is not the same as asserting that the examiner did not have jurisdiction.” Id. 2013GOV’T CODE ANN. § 143.057(j) (West 2008). “[A] hearing examiner exceeds his jurisdiction when his acts are not authorized by the [Fire Fighters and Police Officers Civil Service] Act or are contrary to it, or when they invade the policy-setting realm protected by the nondelegation doctrine.” City of Pasadena, 292 S.W.3d at 21 . “[A]sserting that a decision made by a hearing examiner is incorrect is not the same as asserting that the examiner did not have jurisdiction.” Id. | 2 | 5 |
City of Houston v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2013“A declaratory judgment action cannot create jurisdiction but is merely a procedural device for deciding cases already within a court’s jurisdiction.” City of Houston v. Williams, 99 S.W.3d 709, 713 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Houston v. Tones
green
1 sentence2013Smith, 292 S.W.3d at 21 ; Tones, 299 S.W.3d at 240 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.