Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Funderburk Ex Rel. Funderburkgreen2 sentences2011App. P. 33.1(a)(2)(A) (providing that a trial court may rule on a motion expressly or implicitly); Leland, 257 S.W.3d at 207–08; see also Lewis v. Funderburk, 253 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Tex. 2008) (holding that a deficiency in any requirement of section 74.351 may be cured by amending an expert report or by serving a report from a separate expert). 2011P. 33.1(a)(2)(A) (providing that a trial court may rule on a motion expressly or implicitly); Leland, 257 S.W.3d at 207-08 ; see also Lewis v. Funderburk, 253 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Tex.2008) (holding that a deficiency in any requirement of section 74.351 may be cured by amending an expert report or by serving a report from a separate expert). | 5 | 5 |
Leland v. Brandalgreen2 sentences2011App. P. 33.1(a)(2)(A) (providing that a trial court may rule on a motion expressly or implicitly); Leland, 257 S.W.3d at 207–08; see also Lewis v. Funderburk, 253 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Tex. 2008) (holding that a deficiency in any requirement of section 74.351 may be cured by amending an expert report or by serving a report from a separate expert). 2011P. 33.1(a)(2)(A) (providing that a trial court may rule on a motion expressly or implicitly); Leland, 257 S.W.3d at 207-08 ; see also Lewis v. Funderburk, 253 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Tex.2008) (holding that a deficiency in any requirement of section 74.351 may be cured by amending an expert report or by serving a report from a separate expert). | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||