EKG test (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

EKG test in Texas

5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Salcedo v. El Paso Hospital District green
tex · 1983
2 sentences

2003In Salcedo, 659 S.W.2d at 31 , the emergency room physician administered an EKG test to the plaintiff who was experiencing severe chest pains.

2003In Salcedo, 659 S.W.2d at 31 , the emergency room physician administered an EKG test to the plaintiff who was experiencing severe chest pains.

42003–2011
Nguyen v. Southwestern Emergency Physicians, P.C. green
ga · 2015
2 sentences

2019Viewed objectively, the services that were undisputedly provided to Williams—an EKG test, a chest X-ray, and repeated monitoring of her vital signs—were “medical services commonly provided in an emergency department, like evaluating, classifying, and treating patients who come in asserting that they require emergency care,” Nguyen, 779 S.E.2d at 339 ; thus, they were bona fide or actual emergency services even though Pompa believed at the time that Williams “had time to wait” and even though Williams later was diagnosed with a condition not needing emergency treatment.

2019Viewed objectively, the services that were undisputedly provided to Williams—an EKG test, a chest X-ray, and repeated monitoring of her vital signs—were “medical services commonly provided in an emergency department, like evaluating, classifying, and treating patients who come in asserting that they require emergency care,” Nguyen, 779 S.E.2d at 339 ; thus, they were bona fide or actual emergency services even though Pompa believed at the time that Williams “had time to wait” and even though Williams later was diagnosed with a condition not needing emergency treatment.

12019–2019

Where else courts name it

TX 5 (2003–2019) MO 2 (1997–2001) IL 2 (2015–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check