Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Martingreen2 sentences2018However, the generally-applied abuse of discretion standard is not appropriate "when the decision does not turn on the credibility or demeanor of witnesses." Ex parte Martin , 6 S.W.3d 524 , 526 (Tex. Crim. 2016The generally-applied abuse of discretion standard is not appropriate “when the decision does not turn on the credibility or demeanor of witnesses.” Ex parte Martin, 6 S.W.3d 524, 526 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). | 3 | 4 |
Ex Parte Carlos Alexander Aguilargreen2 sentences2018App. 1999) ; see also Ex parte Aguilar , 501 S.W.3d 176 , 178 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, no pet.). 2017Id. (“The generally-applied abuse of discretion standard is not appropriate when the decision does not turn on the credibility or demeanor of witnesses.”); see also Ex parte Mello, 355 S.W.3d 827, 832 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref d) (“If the resolution of the ultimate question turns on an' application of legal standards, we review the determination de novo.”). | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Mellogreen1 sentence2017Id. (“The generally-applied abuse of discretion standard is not appropriate when the decision does not turn on the credibility or demeanor of witnesses.”); see also Ex parte Mello, 355 S.W.3d 827, 832 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref d) (“If the resolution of the ultimate question turns on an' application of legal standards, we review the determination de novo.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||