Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leslye Curnutt, on Behalf of Puckett Ranchez, Ltd. and Alan Robbins, on Behalf of Munna, Ltd. v. Conocophillips Companygreen1 sentence2019See Curnutt v. ConocoPhillips Co., 508 S.W.3d 641, 645 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016, no pet.) (concluding that the trial court’s failure to hold an oral hearing was harmless error because the motion to reinstate contained no new arguments and simply restated previous arguments). | 1 | 1 |
Hoffman v. Blaskigreen2 sentences2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. 2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corpgreen2 sentences2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. 2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
cluster 490159green2 sentences2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. 2016"I1d. at 80 (citing Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1960)); see also Liaw Su Teng v. Skaarup Shipping Corp., 743 F.2d 1140, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying the Hoffman standard, overruled on othergrounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, LA, 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1987)). . 29805 F. Supp. 1392 , 1394 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen1 sentence2015Also a Court applying the Hoffman test must be “perfectly clear, from a careful consideration of all the circumstances in the case” that the person asserting the privilege cannot possibly provide an answer that would have any remote tendency to provide a link the chain of evidence that might have a “tendency to incriminate.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 12 (1964), overruled in non-pertinent part by Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 285-86 (1991) [concerning the test for voluntariness of a confession]. | 1 | 1 |
Malloy v. Hogangreen1 sentence2015Also a Court applying the Hoffman test must be “perfectly clear, from a careful consideration of all the circumstances in the case” that the person asserting the privilege cannot possibly provide an answer that would have any remote tendency to provide a link the chain of evidence that might have a “tendency to incriminate.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 12 (1964), overruled in non-pertinent part by Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 285-86 (1991) [concerning the test for voluntariness of a confession]. | 1 | 1 |
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.red1 sentence2014See, e.g., Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Pena
green
1 sentence1994However, relying on Ex parte Pena, 820 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), the State does challenge the remedy requested. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.