instruction on the statutory presumption (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

instruction on the statutory presumption in Texas

5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Abdnor v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1994 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See Abnor, 871 S.W.2d at 732 .

2009See Abnor , 871 S.W.2d at 732 .

22
Green v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Green v. State, 476 S.W.3d 440, 445 (Tex. Crim.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Villarreal, Rene Daniel green
texcrimapp · 2015
2 sentences

2015Villarreal, 393 S.W.3d 867 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012) reversed, 453 S.W.3d 429 .3 In Villarreal, the San Antonio court reversed the defendant’s murder conviction concluding that (1) the jury should have been instructed on the presumption of reasonableness, and (2) the defendant was egregiously harmed by the trial court’s failure to do so.

2015Id. at 432 .

22015–2015
Rene Daniel Villarreal v. State green
texapp · 2012
1 sentence

2015Villarreal, 393 S.W.3d 867 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012) reversed, 453 S.W.3d 429 .3 In Villarreal, the San Antonio court reversed the defendant’s murder conviction concluding that (1) the jury should have been instructed on the presumption of reasonableness, and (2) the defendant was egregiously harmed by the trial court’s failure to do so.

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Penal Code § 22.01 (3) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 22.02 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

HI 6 (2005–2014) TX 5 (2009–2019) CT 2 (1986–1986) IL 2 (1968–1976) FL 2 (2004–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check