Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1986–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re REJgreen2 sentences1999See In re R.E.J. , 511 S.W.2d 347 (Tex. Civ. 1999See In re R.E.J., 511 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1974, no writ). | 3 | 3 |
Haley v. Ohiogreen2 sentences1999Aware of Gault , as well as the admonition in Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948), that admissions and confessions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution, the legislature enacted Title III to determine and protect the best interest of the juvenile, assure that the juvenile’s constitutional and statutory rights are recognized and enforced, and permit waiver of the juvenile’s rights only under certain carefully prescribed conditions. 1999Aware of Gault , as well as the admonition in Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948), that admissions and confessions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution, the legislature enacted Title III to determine and protect the best interest of the juvenile, assure that the juvenile’s constitutional and statutory rights are recognized and enforced, and permit waiver of the juvenile’s rights only under certain carefully prescribed conditions. | 2 | 5 |
Lovell v. Stategreen2 sentences1986See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Lovell, 525 S.W.2d at 514 (admissions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution); Dixon, 639 S.W.2d at 11 (juvenile’s statement, which would be admissible if made by an adult, held inadmissible). 1986See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Lovell, 525 S.W.2d at 514 (admissions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution); Dixon, 639 S.W.2d at 11 (juvenile's statement, which would be admissible if made by an adult, held inadmissible). | 2 | 2 |
Dixon v. Stategreen2 sentences1986See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Lovell, 525 S.W.2d at 514 (admissions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution); Dixon, 639 S.W.2d at 11 (juvenile’s statement, which would be admissible if made by an adult, held inadmissible). 1986See Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 , 68 S.Ct. 302 , 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Lovell, 525 S.W.2d at 514 (admissions made by a juvenile require careful inquiry and special caution); Dixon, 639 S.W.2d at 11 (juvenile's statement, which would be admissible if made by an adult, held inadmissible). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.