Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1972–1985 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Fennellgreen2 sentences1974The cases of Bobo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 947 , and Ex parte Fennell, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 286 , 284 S.W.2d 727 , hold that where a violation occurs and a warrant issues within the probationary period and the hearing is not thereafter unduly delayed the court has authority to revoke probation though the term has expired before the order is entered. 1973Hearing was held on November 3, 1972, after the term of probation had ended. *741 The State relies upon Bobo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 947 , wherein this Court, citing Ex parte Fennell, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 286 , 284 S.W.2d 727 , held that where the violation occurs and a warrant issues within the probationary period and the hearing is not, thereafter, unduly delayed, the court has authority to revoke probation though the term has expired before the order is entered. | 2 | 5 |
Bryant v. Stategreen2 sentences1973See Bryant v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 496 S.W.2d 565 . 1973See Bryant v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 496 S.W.2d 565 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bobo v. State
green
2 sentences1974The cases of Bobo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 947 , and Ex parte Fennell, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 286 , 284 S.W.2d 727 , hold that where a violation occurs and a warrant issues within the probationary period and the hearing is not thereafter unduly delayed the court has authority to revoke probation though the term has expired before the order is entered. 1973Hearing was held on November 3, 1972, after the term of probation had ended. *741 The State relies upon Bobo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 947 , wherein this Court, citing Ex parte Fennell, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 286 , 284 S.W.2d 727 , held that where the violation occurs and a warrant issues within the probationary period and the hearing is not, thereafter, unduly delayed, the court has authority to revoke probation though the term has expired before the order is entered. | 2 | 1973–1974 |
Stover v. State
green
1 sentence1972In Stover, supra, the opinion does not indicate if or when a capias issued. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.