twelfth assignment error in Texas

1916In Western Union Telegraph Company v. Rosentreter, 80 Tex. 406 , 16 S. W. 25 , the-Supreme Court, answering an assignment in point with the assignment in the instant case, in which a judgment was secured for $1,000, says: “At last it now only remains to dispose of the twelfth assignment of error. * * * This assignment claims that the verdict of the jury is *1019 excessive in amount.

1916In Western Union Telegraph Company v. Rosentreter, 80 Tex. 406 , 16 S. W. 25 , the-Supreme Court, answering an assignment in point with the assignment in the instant case, in which a judgment was secured for $1,000, says: “At last it now only remains to dispose of the twelfth assignment of error. * * * This assignment claims that the verdict of the jury is *1019 excessive in amount.

1915Railway v. Guess, 154 S. W. 1060 . [4] The charge complained of in the twelfth assignment of error is copied bodily' from an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District in the case of Railway v. Woodall, 159 S. W. 1012 , which was approved by that court, and while it maybe in conflict with the opinion in the ease of Railway v. Welch, 86 Tex. 203 , 24 S. W. 390 , herein cited, we deem it unnecessary to attempt a reconciliation of the two opinions.

1915Railway v. Guess, 154 S. W. 1060 . [4] The charge complained of in the twelfth assignment of error is copied bodily' from an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District in the case of Railway v. Woodall, 159 S. W. 1012 , which was approved by that court, and while it maybe in conflict with the opinion in the ease of Railway v. Welch, 86 Tex. 203 , 24 S. W. 390 , herein cited, we deem it unnecessary to attempt a reconciliation of the two opinions.

1915Railway v. Guess, 154 S. W. 1060 . [4] The charge complained of in the twelfth assignment of error is copied bodily' from an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District in the case of Railway v. Woodall, 159 S. W. 1012 , which was approved by that court, and while it maybe in conflict with the opinion in the ease of Railway v. Welch, 86 Tex. 203 , 24 S. W. 390 , herein cited, we deem it unnecessary to attempt a reconciliation of the two opinions.

1915Railway v. Guess, 154 S. W. 1060 . [4] The charge complained of in the twelfth assignment of error is copied bodily' from an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District in the case of Railway v. Woodall, 159 S. W. 1012 , which was approved by that court, and while it maybe in conflict with the opinion in the ease of Railway v. Welch, 86 Tex. 203 , 24 S. W. 390 , herein cited, we deem it unnecessary to attempt a reconciliation of the two opinions.

1915Shaw v. Garrison, 174 S. W. 942 .

1914By virtue of this admission, "the proceedings are placed in such a status that, if neither party offered any evidence, judgment would be rendered, as a matter of law, in favor of the plaintiffs." Sanders v. Bridges, 67 Tex. 93 , 2 S.W. 663 .

1914By virtue of this admission, "the proceedings are placed in such a status that, if neither party offered any evidence, judgment would be rendered, as a matter of law, in favor of the plaintiffs." Sanders v. Bridges, 67 Tex. 93 , 2 S.W. 663 .

1911Railway Co. v. Taylor, 123 S. W. 715 ; Railway Co. v. Monell, 50 Tex. Civ, *999 App. 287, 110 S. W. 504 ; Railway Co. v. Roberts, 91 S. W. 375 . [12, 13] The twelfth assignment of error is that the court, erred in overruling and refusing the defendant’s amended motion for a new trial on the assignment that the verdict ■of the jury was excessive, and that its ex-cessiveness was caused by improper argument and statements of plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. M.