Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gibson v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2011Code R994-405-202(3)(b). "[C]ontinued inefficiency, repeated carelessness or evidence of a lack of care expected of a reasonable person in a similar circumstance may satisfy the element of control if the claimant had the ability to perform satisfactorily." Id. 2011See Gibson v. Department of Emp't Sec., 840 P.2d 780, 783 (Utah Ct.App.1992). | 1 | 2 |
Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Servicesgreen2 sentences2012See Autoliv, 2001 UT App 198, ¶ 17 , 29 P.3d 7 . 2012See Autoliv, 2001 UT App 198, ¶ 17 . | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Department of Employment Securitygreen1 sentence2011See Johnson v. Department of Emp't Sec., 782 P.2d 965, 968 (Utah Ct.App.19983). | 1 | 1 |
Salt Lake Donated v. Dept. of Workforcegreen2 sentences2011See Salt Lake Donated Dental Servs., Inc. v. Department of Workforce Servs., 2011 UT App 7, ¶ 5 , 246 P.3d 1206 (indicating that because the court saw no error in the Board's decision with respect to the control element, the court did not need to address the culpability and knowledge elements). 13 To establish the element of knowledge, an employer must prove that the employee knew of the conduct the employer expected and was able to anticipate the negative effect of failing to adhere to that conduct. 2011See Salt Lake Donated Dental Servs., Inc. v. Department of Workforce Servs., 2011 UT App 7, ¶ 5 , 246 P.3d 1206 (indicating that because the court saw no error in the Board's decision with respect to the control element, the court did not need to address the culpability and knowledge elements). 13 To establish the element of knowledge, an employer must prove that the employee knew of the conduct the employer expected and was able to anticipate the negative effect of failing to adhere to that conduct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Utah Paiute Tribal Housing v. Workforce Services
green
1 sentence2019Where “the evidence is disputed, as it was here, we defer to the Board’s assessment of credibility and resolution of conflicting evidence.” See id. (cleaned up). 20190164-CA 6 2019 UT App 191 Utah Paiute Tribal Housing Authority Inc. v. Department of Workforce Services ¶13 Accordingly, the Housing Authority is unable to satisfy the culpability prong of the just cause analysis, and we decline to disturb the Board’s decision. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Dinger v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board
green
1 sentence2019Where “the evidence is disputed, as it was here, we defer to the Board’s assessment of credibility and resolution of conflicting evidence.” See id. (cleaned up). 20190164-CA 6 2019 UT App 191 Utah Paiute Tribal Housing Authority Inc. v. Department of Workforce Services ¶13 Accordingly, the Housing Authority is unable to satisfy the culpability prong of the just cause analysis, and we decline to disturb the Board’s decision. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
EAGALA, INC. v. Department of Workforce Services
green
1 sentence2011Thus, we conclude that it was "within the realm of reasonableness and rationality," EAGALA, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Servs., 2007 UT App 48 , ¶ 9, 157 P.3d 334 , for the Board to conclude that Prosper failed to establish the knowledge element of the just cause inquiry,. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008Cotran, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 , 948 P.2d at 422 . 2008Cotran, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 , 948 P.2d at 422 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.