number of nonexclusive factors (Utah) · Go Syfert
← Utah issues

number of nonexclusive factors in Utah

5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hon. Boydengreen
utah · 2019 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Previously, “we have outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief,” including “the egregiousness of the alleged error, the significance of the legal issue presented by the petition, and the severity of the consequences occasioned by the alleged error.” Utah v. Boyden, 2019 UT 11, ¶ 43, 441 P.3d 737 (cleaned up).

2025Previously, “we have outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief,” including “the egregiousness of the alleged error, the significance of the legal issue presented by the petition, and the severity of the consequences occasioned by the alleged error.” Utah v. Boyden, 2019 UT 11, ¶ 43, 441 P.3d 737 (cleaned up).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Barrett green
utah · 2005
2 sentences

2016"Unlike a party filing a direct appeal, a petitioner seeking rule 65B(d) extraordinary relief has no right to receive a remedy that corrects a lower court's mishandling of a particular case." State v. Barrett, 2005 UT 88 , 1 23, 127 P.3d 682 . 116 In State v. Barrett, we outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief, Id. 1 24.

2016"Unlike a party filing a direct appeal, a petitioner seeking rule 65B(d) extraordinary relief has no right to receive a remedy that corrects a lower court's mishandling of a particular case." State v. Barrett, 2005 UT 88 , 1 23, 127 P.3d 682 . 116 In State v. Barrett, we outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief, Id. 1 24.

22016–2019
State v. Gulbransen green
utah · 2005
2 sentences

2016State v. Gulbransen, 2005 UT 7, ¶ 34 , 106 P.3d 734 (citation omitted). ¶88 To guide courts in the determination of whether a photograph is gruesome, we eventually articulated a number of nonexclusive factors for consideration: First, we consider whether the photograph is in color or black and white, because color photographs are generally more disturbing because of their ability to provide the viewer with vivid images of blood, wounds, bruising, and the like. . . .

2016State v. Gulbransen, 2005 UT 7, ¶ 34 , 106 P.3d 734 (citation omitted). ¶88 To guide courts in the determination of whether a photograph is gruesome, we eventually articulated a number of nonexclusive factors for consideration: First, we consider whether the photograph is in color or black and white, because color photographs are generally more disturbing because of their ability to provide the viewer with vivid images of blood, wounds, bruising, and the like. . . .

22016–2016
Gilbert v. Third Dist Ct JJs green
utah · 2016
2 sentences

2019As noted above, we have "outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief." Gilbert v. Maughan , 2016 UT 31 , ¶ 16, 379 P.3d 1263 .

2019As noted above, we have "outlined a number of nonexclusive factors a court may consider in deciding whether to grant a petition for extraordinary relief." Gilbert v. Maughan , 2016 UT 31 , ¶ 16, 379 P.3d 1263 .

12019–2019

Where else courts name it

TX 12 (2005–2024) UT 5 (2016–2025) WA 3 (2001–2018) NC 3 (2014–2022) CA 2 (2001–2021) OR 2 (2022–2023) VT 2 (2003–2016) TN 2 (2010–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check