Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Twymangreen2 sentences2008Twyman, 143 Wn.2d at 122 (unless there is a “ ‘gross departure from the statute’ ” that would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wn.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether “ ‘there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,’ ” or whether “ ‘the jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might have been any inherent 2008Twyman, 143 Wash.2d at 122 , 17 P.3d 1184 (unless there is a "`gross departure from the statute'" which would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wash.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶ 14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether "`there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,'" or whether "`the *686 jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might h | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rice
green
2 sentences2008Twyman, 143 Wn.2d at 122 (unless there is a “ ‘gross departure from the statute’ ” that would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wn.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether “ ‘there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,’ ” or whether “ ‘the jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might have been any inherent 2008Twyman, 143 Wn.2d at 122 (unless there is a “ ‘gross departure from the statute’ ” that would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wn.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether “ ‘there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,’ ” or whether “ ‘the jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might have been any inherent | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Finlayson
green
2 sentences2008Twyman, 143 Wn.2d at 122 (unless there is a “ ‘gross departure from the statute’ ” that would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wn.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether “ ‘there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,’ ” or whether “ ‘the jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might have been any inherent 2008Twyman, 143 Wash.2d at 122 , 17 P.3d 1184 (unless there is a "`gross departure from the statute'" which would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wash.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶ 14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether "`there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,'" or whether "`the *686 jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might h | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Fergen v. Sestero
green
2 sentences2026Fergen v. Sestero, 182 Wn.2d 794, 803 , 346 P.3d 708 (2015). 2026Fergen v. Sestero, 182 Wn.2d 794, 803 , 346 P.3d 708 (2015). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
St. Joseph Hospital & Health Care Center v. Department of Health
green
1 sentence2013Id. ¶36 Evergreen and Providence were allowed to seek judicial review of the grant of a certificate to Odyssey. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Twyman
green
2 sentences2008Twyman, 143 Wash.2d at 122 , 17 P.3d 1184 (unless there is a "`gross departure from the statute'" which would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wash.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶ 14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether "`there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,'" or whether "`the *686 jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might h 2008Twyman, 143 Wash.2d at 122 , 17 P.3d 1184 (unless there is a "`gross departure from the statute'" which would give rise to presumed prejudice, the challenger must demonstrate actual prejudice (quoting State v. Rice, 120 Wash.2d 549, 562 , 844 P.2d 416 (1993))). ¶ 14 In establishing actual prejudice, the most important questions are whether "`there was any exclusion of any class of citizen or weighting of the jury list or that the jury list was not a representative cross section of the community,'" or whether "`the *686 jury list, the venire or the jury itself was so composed that there might h | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Michel v. City of Richland
green
1 sentence1999City of Richland v. Michel, 89 Wn. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.