Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Irvin v. Dowdgreen2 sentences2001Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961). 1990Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961); McGeever v. State, 239 Wis. 87, 96 , 300 N.W.2d 485 (1941). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Louisgreen2 sentences2006"To ensure an impartial jury, Wis. Stat. § 805.08 (1) provides for juror disqualification if a prospective juror `is not indifferent in the case.'" State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 847 , 596 N.W.2d 736 (1999). [3] ¶ 19 "Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias." Louis, 156 Wis.2d at 478 , 457 N.W.2d 484 . 2006"To ensure an impartial jury, Wis. Stat. § 805.08 (1) provides for juror disqualification if a prospective juror `is not indifferent in the case.'" State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 847 , 596 N.W.2d 736 (1999). [3] ¶ 19 "Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias." Louis, 156 Wis.2d at 478 , 457 N.W.2d 484 . | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pettit
green
2 sentences2003Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d at 638 ; State v. Paulson, 106 Wis. 2d 96, 108 , 315 N.W.2d 350 (1982). 2002Id. at 638 . ¶ 10. | 2 | 2002–2003 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2021STAT. § 805.08(1).4 ¶17 “Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias.” State v. Smith, 2006 WI 74, ¶19 , 291 Wis. 2d 569 , 716 N.W.2d 482 (citation omitted). 2021STAT. § 805.08(1).4 ¶17 “Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias.” State v. Smith, 2006 WI 74, ¶19 , 291 Wis. 2d 569 , 716 N.W.2d 482 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Faucher
green
2 sentences2019However, “[p]rospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias.” State v. Gesch, 167 Wis. 2d 660, 666 , 482 N.W.2d 99 (1992) (citation omitted). ¶22 Our supreme court has explained that “subjective bias” is the type of bias “that is revealed through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror.” Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d at 717 . 2019Indeed, “subjective bias refers to the bias that is revealed by the prospective juror on voir dire: it refers to the prospective juror’s state of mind.” Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Gesch
green
2 sentences2019However, “[p]rospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias.” State v. Gesch, 167 Wis. 2d 660, 666 , 482 N.W.2d 99 (1992) (citation omitted). ¶22 Our supreme court has explained that “subjective bias” is the type of bias “that is revealed through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror.” Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d at 717 . 2019However, “[p]rospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias.” State v. Gesch, 167 Wis. 2d 660, 666 , 482 N.W.2d 99 (1992) (citation omitted). ¶22 Our supreme court has explained that “subjective bias” is the type of bias “that is revealed through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror.” Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d at 717 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Mendoza
green
2 sentences2006"To ensure an impartial jury, Wis. Stat. § 805.08 (1) provides for juror disqualification if a prospective juror `is not indifferent in the case.'" State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 847 , 596 N.W.2d 736 (1999). [3] ¶ 19 "Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias." Louis, 156 Wis.2d at 478 , 457 N.W.2d 484 . 2006"To ensure an impartial jury, Wis. Stat. § 805.08 (1) provides for juror disqualification if a prospective juror `is not indifferent in the case.'" State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 847 , 596 N.W.2d 736 (1999). [3] ¶ 19 "Prospective jurors are presumed impartial, and the challenger to that presumption bears the burden of proving bias." Louis, 156 Wis.2d at 478 , 457 N.W.2d 484 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Paulson
green
2 sentences2003Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d at 638 ; State v. Paulson, 106 Wis. 2d 96, 108 , 315 N.W.2d 350 (1982). 2003Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d at 638 ; State v. Paulson, 106 Wis. 2d 96, 108 , 315 N.W.2d 350 (1982). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McGeever v. State
green
2 sentences1990Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961); McGeever v. State, 239 Wis. 87, 96 , 300 N.W.2d 485 (1941). 1990Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961); McGeever v. State, 239 Wis. 87, 96 , 300 N.W.2d 485 (1941). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Three Lakes Ass'n v. Kessler
green
2 sentences1990Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961); McGeever v. State, 239 Wis. 87, 96 , 300 N.W.2d 485 (1941). 1990Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 (1961); McGeever v. State, 239 Wis. 87, 96 , 300 N.W.2d 485 (1941). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.