claimed due process violation (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

claimed due process violation in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Smithgreen
washctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See Smith, 68 Wn.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Lively green
wash · 1996
2 sentences

1997The majority in Lively indicated that while these findings cannot be considered in a sufficiency review, they can be relied on "in the context of a claimed due process violation." Lively, 130 Wash.2d at 24 , 921 P.2d 1035 . [1] See Jeffrey Needle, Driving while Black— D.W.B., Trial News 3 (Dec.1996) (commenting on Washington v. City of Santa Monica, 98 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.1996), "Young African-American males frequently report being stopped and detained for reasons that are superficially pretextual.

1997The majority in Lively indicated that while these findings cannot be considered in a sufficiency review, they can be relied on "in the context of a claimed due process violation." Lively, 130 Wash.2d at 24 , 921 P.2d 1035 . [1] See Jeffrey Needle, Driving while Black— D.W.B., Trial News 3 (Dec.1996) (commenting on Washington v. City of Santa Monica, 98 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.1996), "Young African-American males frequently report being stopped and detained for reasons that are superficially pretextual.

21997–1997
State Of Washington v. Tommie Lewis green
washctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2018On the contrary, Seward held that the VPA and the DNA fee are rationally related to the State's interest: State v. Lewis, 194 Wn.

12018–2018
State Of Washington v. Michael Christopher Shelton green
washctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2017But Seward held that a mandatory VPA is rationally related to the State's interest: 5 194 Wn.

12017–2017
cluster 728152 green
ca9 · 1996
1 sentence

1997The majority in Lively indicated that while these findings cannot be considered in a sufficiency review, they can be relied on "in the context of a claimed due process violation." Lively, 130 Wash.2d at 24 , 921 P.2d 1035 . [1] See Jeffrey Needle, Driving while Black— D.W.B., Trial News 3 (Dec.1996) (commenting on Washington v. City of Santa Monica, 98 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.1996), "Young African-American males frequently report being stopped and detained for reasons that are superficially pretextual.

11997–1997

Where else courts name it

MI 24 (1982–2026) PA 9 (1980–2019) WA 5 (1997–2018) ME 5 (1974–2024) CT 5 (1986–2022) IL 4 (2012–2024) OR 4 (2008–2017) NM 3 (2013–2023) CA 2 (1990–2024) KS 2 (2013–2017) TN 2 (2010–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check