5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Troxel v. Granvillegreen2 sentences2005Id. at 68-69 (citations omitted). ¶21 The Court’s holding emerges in the next paragraph: The decisional framework employed by the Superior Court directly contravened the traditional presumption that a fit parent will act in the best interest of his or her child. 2005Id. at 68-69 , 120 S.Ct. 2054 (citations omitted). ¶ 21 The Court's holding emerges in the next paragraph: The decisional framework employed by the Superior Court directly contravened the traditional presumption that a fit parent will act in the best interest of his or her child. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re the Personal Restraint of Haghighi
green
1 sentence2015Haghighi, 178 Wn.2d at 443 . ¶58 Concerning the first element, we define “finality” as the point at which a judgment of conviction has been rendered, the availability of appeal exhausted, and the time for a petition for certiorari elapsed or a petition for certio-rari finally denied. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Rupe
green
2 sentences1990Moreover, as this court noted in State v. Rupe, 108 Wn.2d 734, 770 , 743 P.2d 210 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1061 (1988), all possible mitigating factors were before the jury. 1990Moreover, as this court noted in State v. Rupe, 108 Wn.2d 734, 770 , 743 P.2d 210 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1061 (1988), all possible mitigating factors were before the jury. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Wanrow
green
2 sentences1990He maintains that conflict on a material issue, the decisional standard, requires reversal, relying upon, among other cases, State v. Wanrow, 88 Wn.2d 221, 239 , 559 P.2d 548 (1977). 1990He maintains that conflict on a material issue, the decisional standard, requires reversal, relying upon, among other cases, State v. Wanrow, 88 Wn.2d 221, 239 , 559 P.2d 548 (1977). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Lynaugh v. Cordova
green
2 sentences1990Moreover, as this court noted in State v. Rupe, 108 Wn.2d 734, 770 , 743 P.2d 210 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1061 (1988), all possible mitigating factors were before the jury. 1990Moreover, as this court noted in State v. Rupe, 108 Wn.2d 734, 770 , 743 P.2d 210 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1061 (1988), all possible mitigating factors were before the jury. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Godfrey v. Washington
green
2 sentences1976If applicable at all, they support only the rule that the change made in an opinion is retroactively applicable to the case in which the change is adopted (Memel v. Reimer, supra, Freehe v. Freehe, supra, and Blaak v. Davidson, supra); or, that a statute enacted by the legislature is deemed to have retroactive application if such legislative intent is found (Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975)). 1976If applicable at all, they support only the rule that the change made in an opinion is retroactively applicable to the case in which the change is adopted (Memel v. Reimer, supra, Freehe v. Freehe, supra, and Blaak v. Davidson, supra); or, that a statute enacted by the legislature is deemed to have retroactive application if such legislative intent is found (Godfrey v. State, 84 Wn.2d 959 , 530 P.2d 630 (1975)). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.