decisional rule (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

decisional rule in Pennsylvania

8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kendrick v. DA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTYgreen
pa · 2007 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Kendrick v. District Attorney of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157 , 916 A.2d 529, 538 (2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Eller, 569 Pa. 622 , 807 A.2d 838, 844 (2002) (emphasis in original)).

2014Kendrick v. District Attorney of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157 , 916 A.2d 529, 538 (2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Eller, 569 Pa. 622 , 807 A.2d 838, 844 (2002) (emphasis in original)).

11
Commonwealth v. Ellergreen
pa · 2002 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Kendrick v. District Attorney of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157 , 916 A.2d 529, 538 (2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Eller, 569 Pa. 622 , 807 A.2d 838, 844 (2002) (emphasis in original)).

2014Kendrick v. District Attorney of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157 , 916 A.2d 529, 538 (2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Eller, 569 Pa. 622 , 807 A.2d 838, 844 (2002) (emphasis in original)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Cabeza green
pa · 1983
2 sentences

2017Commonwealth v. Cabeza, 503 Pa. 228 , 469 A.2d 146 (1983).

2017Commonwealth v. Cabeza, 503 Pa. 228 , 469 A.2d 146 (1983).

42017–2017
Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson red
scotus · 1971
2 sentences

2007As to the issue of the retroactive effect of IOGA, both .Forest and Warren argue that the proper means of determining whether a decisional rule should apply retroactively is the three-prong test set forth in Chevron, 404 U.S. at 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349 .

2007As to the issue of the retroactive effect of IOGA, both .Forest and Warren argue that the proper means of determining whether a decisional rule should apply retroactively is the three-prong test set forth in Chevron, 404 U.S. at 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349 .

12007–2007
Local 730 v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pa · 1984
1 sentence

1985The desire of the Supreme Court appears to be that “the administrative units involved in the compensation eligibility decision . . . have little difficulty in resolving the simple factual question of who first departed from the terms of the expired agreement.” Local 730, 505 Pa. at 487 , 480 A.2d at 1004 .

11985–1985
Commonwealth v. Guild Theatre, Inc. green
pa · 1968
2 sentences

1972The majority, by emphasizing certain language which appeared in Mr. Justice O’Brien’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Guild Theatre, Inc., 432 Pa. 378 , 248 A. 2d 45 (1968), appears to believe that the requisite procedural safeguards must be “clearly embodied in a statute”.

1972The majority, by emphasizing certain language which appeared in Mr. Justice O’Brien’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Guild Theatre, Inc., 432 Pa. 378 , 248 A. 2d 45 (1968), appears to believe that the requisite procedural safeguards must be “clearly embodied in a statute”.

11972–1972

Statutes the citing opinions construe

PA § 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2307 (4) PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5571 (4) PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9543 (4) PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9545 (4) PA § 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1543 (4) PA § 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1547 (4) PA § 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 17 (1960–2023) NY 13 (1963–2002) AL 8 (2000–2011) PA 8 (1972–2017) NJ 6 (1997–2024) IL 5 (1974–2013) WA 5 (1976–2015) VA 4 (1989–2014) MI 4 (1962–1984) OR 4 (2005–2014) MS 3 (2001–2025) KS 3 (2001–2001) DE 3 (1953–2025) MO 3 (1972–2002) OK 2 (1981–1981) FL 2 (1969–1976) CO 2 (2015–2015) IN 2 (1976–2010) MD 2 (2006–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check