Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re the Personal Restraint of Goodwin
green
2 sentences2009In Goodwin, we cited both these cases as examples where a defendant can waive his claim on appeal that the sentencing court miscalculated his offender score by agreeing to facts at sentencing that he later disputes. 146 Wash.2d at 875-76 , 50 P.3d 618 . 2009In Goodwin, we cited both these cases as examples where a defendant can waive his claim on appeal that the sentencing court miscalculated his offender score by agreeing to facts at sentencing that he later disputes. 146 Wash.2d at 875-76 , 50 P.3d 618 . | 3 | 2004–2019 |
Neder v. United States
green
2 sentences2010Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 8 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L. 2010Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 8 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.