defendant makes claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

defendant makes claim in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Waldengreen
wash · 1997 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See State v. Walden, 131 Wash.2d 469, 473 , 932 P.2d 1237 (1997) ("To be entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense, the defendant must produce some evidence demonstrating self-defense; however, once the defendant produces some evidence, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove the absence of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt.").

1999See State v. Walden, 131 Wn.2d 469, 473 , 932 P.2d 1237 (1997) (“To be entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense, the defendant must produce some evidence demonstrating self-defense; however, once the defendant produces some evidence, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove the absence of self-defense beyond a reason able doubt.”).

22
State v. Waldengreen
wash · 1997 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See State v. Walden, 131 Wash.2d 469, 473 , 932 P.2d 1237 (1997) ("To be entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense, the defendant must produce some evidence demonstrating self-defense; however, once the defendant produces some evidence, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove the absence of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt.").

1999See State v. Walden, 131 Wn.2d 469, 473 , 932 P.2d 1237 (1997) (“To be entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense, the defendant must produce some evidence demonstrating self-defense; however, once the defendant produces some evidence, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove the absence of self-defense beyond a reason able doubt.”).

22
State v. Jonesgreen
wash · 1988 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988See State v. Jones, 111 Wn.2d 239 , 759 P.2d 1183 (1988).

1988See State v. Jones, 111 Wn.2d 239 , 759 P.2d 1183 (1988).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Jones v. Leidinger green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

1988Ed. 2d 362 , 102 S. Ct. 1186 , reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 950 (1982). 6 The defendant makes no claim that the statute in question (RCW 9A.40.010(1)) implicates constitutionally protected conduct.

1988(Footnote omitted.) Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 494-95 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 , 102 S.Ct. 1186 , reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 950 (1982). [6] *542 The defendant makes no claim that the statute in question (RCW 9A.40.010(1)) implicates constitutionally protected conduct.

11988–1988
Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

1988(Footnote omitted.) Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 494-95 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 , 102 S.Ct. 1186 , reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 950 (1982). [6] *542 The defendant makes no claim that the statute in question (RCW 9A.40.010(1)) implicates constitutionally protected conduct.

1988(Footnote omitted.) Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 494-95 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 , 102 S.Ct. 1186 , reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 950 (1982). [6] *542 The defendant makes no claim that the statute in question (RCW 9A.40.010(1)) implicates constitutionally protected conduct.

11988–1988
Allard v. La Plain neutral
wash · 1928
2 sentences

1982The same is true when, although the defendant is given notice of the action, a judgment is rendered against him so shortly thereafter that he has no adequate opportunity to interpose a defense." 3 Allard v. La Plain, 147 Wash. 497 , 266 P. 688 (1928), does not support a contrary result.

1982The same is true when, although the defendant is given notice of the action, a judgment is rendered against him so shortly thereafter that he has no adequate opportunity to interpose a defense." 3 Allard v. La Plain, 147 Wash. 497 , 266 P. 688 (1928), does not support a contrary result.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

IL 115 (1946–2026) CT 55 (1939–2022) MA 47 (1914–2026) TX 24 (1992–2022) AR 21 (1999–2024) NY 17 (1889–2010) PA 12 (1911–2025) AL 11 (1998–2011) MI 9 (1939–2017) OH 8 (2002–2024) CA 7 (1921–2015) FL 6 (1983–2010) NC 6 (2004–2024) WA 5 (1982–1999) VT 5 (1926–1973) KS 5 (1911–2006) TN 4 (1998–2015) IN 4 (1975–2008) NH 4 (1993–2013) GA 4 (1923–2021) NM 3 (2012–2014) LA 3 (1984–1999) RI 3 (1989–2000) MO 3 (1986–2013) WI 3 (1974–2012) KY 2 (1952–2010) WV 2 (2014–2020) AZ 2 (1971–2014) IA 2 (1929–2019) OR 2 (1980–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check