defendant makes challenge (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

defendant makes challenge in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Lovegreen
ncctapp · 2006 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020If peremptory challenges are unused and the defendant makes no challenge for cause, then he cannot say he was forced to accept an undesirable juror.” Id. at 623-24 , 630 S.E.2d at 241 (citations omitted).

2020If peremptory challenges are unused and the defendant makes no challenge for cause, then he cannot say he was forced to accept an undesirable juror.” Id. at 623-24 , 630 S.E.2d at 241 (citations omitted).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Lawrence green
nc · 2000
2 sentences

2006Id. at 13, 530 S.E.2d at 815 .

2004Lawrence, 352 N.C. at 13 , 530 S.E.2d at 815 .

22004–2006
State v. Garcia green
nc · 2004
2 sentences

2024Garcia, 358 N.C. at 408 , 597 S.E.2d at 743–44 (citation omitted).

2024Garcia, 358 N.C. at 408 , 597 S.E.2d at 743–44 (citation omitted).

12024–2024
Kennedy v. Duke University Medical Center green
ncctapp · 1990
1 sentence

2009If a defendant makes such a claim, then that defendant “must come forward with evidence to show not only that suitable jobs are available, but also that the [claimant-employee] is capable of getting one, taking into account both physical and vocational limitations.” See id. at 33 , 398 S.E.2d 682 .

12009–2009

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1214 (4) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1212 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 115 (1946–2026) CT 55 (1939–2022) MA 47 (1914–2026) TX 24 (1992–2022) AR 21 (1999–2024) NY 17 (1889–2010) PA 12 (1911–2025) AL 11 (1998–2011) MI 9 (1939–2017) OH 8 (2002–2024) CA 7 (1921–2015) FL 6 (1983–2010) NC 6 (2004–2024) WA 5 (1982–1999) VT 5 (1926–1973) KS 5 (1911–2006) TN 4 (1998–2015) IN 4 (1975–2008) NH 4 (1993–2013) GA 4 (1923–2021) NM 3 (2012–2014) LA 3 (1984–1999) RI 3 (1989–2000) MO 3 (1986–2013) WI 3 (1974–2012) KY 2 (1952–2010) WV 2 (2014–2020) AZ 2 (1971–2014) IA 2 (1929–2019) OR 2 (1980–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check