Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bushgreen2 sentences2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. 2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Berhe
green
2 sentences2025This grave error “undermines the public’s faith in the fairness of our judicial system.” Id. 2025This grave error “undermines the public’s faith in the fairness of our judicial system.” Id. | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Young
red
2 sentences2005"History has proven the grave error in creating special classes of individuals for whom constitutional rights are diminished." Id. 2005“History has proven the grave error in creating special classes of individuals for whom constitutional rights are diminished.” Id. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Wise
green
2 sentences2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. 2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
United States v. Marcus
green
2 sentences2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. 2021State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 17 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012) (citing United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 263-65 , 130 S. Ct. 2159 , 176 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2010)); see also People v. Bush, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593, 608 , 7 Cal. App. 5th 457 (2017) (“A structural error requires per se reversal because it cannot be fairly determined how a trial could have been resolved if the grave error had not occurred.”). 11 hearing, to assess the possibility of prejudice to the defendant. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.