Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cunningham v. Reliable Concrete Pumping, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018In Cunningham, Cunningham filed a bankruptcy petition without disclosing his personal injury claim against his former employer. 126 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
McBride Ex Rel. I.M.S. v. Estis Well Service, L.L.C.
green
2 sentences2017McBride, 768 F.3d at 388-89 . 2017McBride, 768 F.3d at 388-89 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co.
green
2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 191 (1959), the United States Supreme Court stated that common law maintenance and cure cases clarify that “the scope of a seaman’s employment or the activities which are related to the furtherance of the vessel are not measured by the standards applied to land-based employment relationships.” In addition, the Court noted that maintenance and cure cases “supply relevant guides to the meaning of the term ‘course of employment’ under the [Jones] Act since” that term “is the equivalent of the ‘service of the ship’ formula used in maintenance and cure cases.” Braen, 361 U.S. at 132-33 . ¶28 2013Ed. 2d 191 (1959), the United States Supreme Court stated that common law maintenance and cure cases clarify that “the scope of a seaman’s employment or the activities which are related to the furtherance of the vessel are not measured by the standards applied to land-based employment relationships.” In addition, the Court noted that maintenance and cure cases “supply relevant guides to the meaning of the term ‘course of employment’ under the [Jones] Act since” that term “is the equivalent of the ‘service of the ship’ formula used in maintenance and cure cases.” Braen, 361 U.S. at 132-33 . ¶28 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Francis A. Deisler v. McCormack Aggregates, Co. Dredge \Sandy Hook\"
green
2 sentences2012Deisler, 54 F.3d at 1087 . [5] After including the attorney fees in the compensatory award, the trial court found the punitive damages award was less than three times the size of the compensatory award and within due process limits. 2012Deisler, 54 F.3d at 1087 . [5] After including the attorney fees in the compensatory award, the trial court found the punitive damages award was less than three times the size of the compensatory award and within due process limits. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 21 , 83 S.Ct. at 1650-51 . 1997Id. at 21 , 83 S.Ct. at 1650-51 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.