Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kjorsvik
green
2 sentences2019State v. Kjorsvik, 117 Wn.2d 93, 101-02 , 812 P.2d 86 (1991). 2019State v. Kjorsvik, 117 Wn.2d 93, 101-02 , 812 P.2d 86 (1991). | 3 | 2016–2019 |
State v. Michielli
green
2 sentences2002Michielli, 132 Wn.2d at 240 . 2002Michielli, 132 Wash.2d at 240 , 937 P.2d 587 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Michielli
green
1 sentence2002Michielli, 132 Wash.2d at 240 , 937 P.2d 587 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.