Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
55 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1943–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.green2 sentences2000Searle & Co. , 56 Ill. 2d 548, 554 (1974) (the statute of limitations in section 2--725(1) of the UCC applies to actions for personal injury predicated upon a theory of breach of warranty under the UCC). 2000Searle & Co., 56 Ill. 2d 548, 554 (1974) (the statute of limitations in section 2 — 725(1) of the UCC applies to actions for personal injury predicated upon a theory of breach of warranty under the UCC). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Davisgreen2 sentences2008The State argues that the judgment was voidable, not void, and that defendant has not shown any statutory exceptions to the limitations period in section 2 — 1401(c). “ ‘Whether a judgment is void or voidable presents a question of jurisdiction.’ People v. Davis, 156 Ill. 2d 149, 155 (1993). 2008The State argues that the judgment was voidable, not void, and that defendant has not shown any statutory exceptions to the limitations period in section 2--1401(c). " 'Whether a judgment is void or voidable presents a question of jurisdiction.' People v. Davis, 156 Ill. 2d 149, 155 (1993). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Raczkowskigreen2 sentences2008A judgment is void (as opposed to voidable) only if the court that entered it lacked jurisdiction.” People v. Raczkowski, 359 Ill. 2008A judgment is void (as opposed to voidable) only if the court that entered it lacked jurisdiction." People v. Raczkowski, 359 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.green2 sentences2003Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co. , 166 Ill. 2d 72, 84-85 (1995). 2003Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co., 166 Ill. 2d 72, 84-85 (1995). | 2 | 2 |
People v. McLaughlingreen2 sentences2002To make a successful showing of fraudulent concealment, the defendant must “allege facts demonstrating that his opponent affirmatively attempted to prevent the discovery of the purported grounds for relief and must offer factual allegations demonstrating his good faith and reasonable diligence in trying to uncover such matters before trial or within the limitations period.” People v. McLaughlin, 324 Ill. 2002To make a successful showing of fraudulent concealment, the defendant must “allege facts demonstrating that his opponent affirmatively attempted to prevent the discovery of the purported grounds for relief and must offer factual allegations demonstrating his good faith and reasonable diligence in trying to uncover such matters before trial or within the limitations period.” People v. McLaughlin , 324 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Nelligan v. Tom Chaney Motors, Inc.green2 sentences2000See, e.g ., Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. , 91 Ill. 2d 69, 94 (1982) (four-year statute of limitations applicable to all breach of warranty claims); Nelligan v. Tom Chaney Motors, Inc. , 133 Ill. 2000See, e.g., Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co., 91 Ill. 2d 69, 94 (1982) (four-year statute of limitations applicable to all breach of warranty claims); Nelligan v. Tom Chaney Motors, Inc., 133 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.green2 sentences2000See, e.g ., Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. , 91 Ill. 2d 69, 94 (1982) (four-year statute of limitations applicable to all breach of warranty claims); Nelligan v. Tom Chaney Motors, Inc. , 133 Ill. 2000See, e.g., Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co., 91 Ill. 2d 69, 94 (1982) (four-year statute of limitations applicable to all breach of warranty claims); Nelligan v. Tom Chaney Motors, Inc., 133 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Durham v. MICHAEL RESSE HOSP. FOUNDATIONgreen2 sentences2001For instance, in Durham v. Michael Reese Hospital, 254 Ill.App.3d 492, 495 , 193 Ill. Dec. 908 , 627 N.E.2d 67 (1993), the plaintiff filed a wrongful death action predicated on medical malpractice within two years of her husband's death. 2001For instance, in Durham v. Michael Reese Hospital, 254 Ill.App.3d 492, 495 , 193 Ill. Dec. 908 , 627 N.E.2d 67 (1993), the plaintiff filed a wrongful death action predicated on medical malpractice within two years of her husband's death. | 1 | 2 |
Crowell v. Bilandicgreen2 sentences1989(See Crowell v. Bilandic (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 422, 427 , 411 N.E.2d 16 .) Accordingly, we hold that the two-year limitations period in section 2—1401 may be waived. 1989(See Crowell v. Bilandic (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 422, 427 , 411 N.E.2d 16 .) Accordingly, we hold that the two-year limitations period in section 2—1401 may be waived. | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. United Airlinesgreen1 sentence2026Johnson v. United Airlines, 203 Ill. 2d 121, 128 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
Home Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurancegreen1 sentence2022Home Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co., 213 Ill. 2d 307, 315 (2004). ¶ 17 In conducting our review of the trial court’s summary-judgment ruling in this case, we must consider the interaction, if any, between two sections of the Illinois Estate Tax Act, section 2(b-1), which contains the QTIP provision, and section 7, which contains the amendment provision. | 1 | 1 |
In Re SGgreen2 sentences2008S.G., 175 Ill. 2d at 496 , 677 N.E.2d at 932 (McMorrow, J., dissenting, joined by Heiple, C.J., and Miller, J.). 2008S.G., 175 Ill. 2d at 496 , 677 N.E.2d at 932 (McMorrow, J., dissenting, joined by Heiple, C.J., and Miller, J.). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Gosiergreen1 sentence2007People v. Gosier, 205 Ill. 2d 198, 206 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Harveygreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Rossgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kokinis v. Kotrichgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Application of County Collectorgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Zacny v. Sasykgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
A.E.I. Music Network, Inc. v. Business Computers, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Music Network, 290 F.3d at 954 . ¶ 31 The Seventh Circuit declined to follow Shaw Industries, holding that the statute of limitations in section 2 of the Bond Act applies only to a suit on the bond; and where no bond is procured, a suit on the bond is impossible. 2013Music Network, Inc. v. Business Computers, Inc., 290 F.3d 952 (7th Cir. 2002), the Seventh Circuit suggested that the applicability of section 2’s limitations period “has divided Illinois’s intermediate appellate court.” A.E.I. | 3 | 2004–2013 |
Pearson Brothers Co. v. Allen
green
2 sentences2001To disregard the limitation of section 2(e) each time it might seem fair to do so would cause intolerable confusion.” Pearson Brothers, 131 Ill. 2001To disregard the limitation of section 2(e) each time it might seem fair to do so would cause intolerable confusion." Pearson Brothers , 131 Ill. | 3 | 1991–2001 |
Eickmeyer v. Blietz Organization, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Although this court is not bound by federal decisions (see Eickmeyer v. Blietz Organization, Inc., 284 Ill. 2004Although this court is not bound by federal decisions (see Eickmeyer v. Blietz Organization, Inc. , 284 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Shaw Industries, Inc. v. Community College District No. 515
green
2 sentences2004Accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice.” Shaw Industries, 318 Ill. 2004Accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint with prejudice." Shaw Industries , 318 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Concrete Structures of the Midwest, Inc., a Corporation v. Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a Corporation
green
2 sentences2000Concrete Structures, 790 F.2d at 42 . 2000Concrete Structures , 790 F.2d at 42 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Guerrero v. Sebastian Contracting Corp.
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 38 . ¶ 23 In response, FCL maintains that Dixon is distinguishable due to the below passage in which the Dixon court attempted to summarize a thinly presented argument: “North Western essentially provides no argument as to why section 2(e) would not apply here, except to say that applying it ignores the ‘dilemma’ North Western was put in by the dismissal of its contribution counterclaim. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Miles
green
1 sentence2023The trial court dismissed defendant’s section 2-1401 petition without an evidentiary hearing, so our review is de novo (see id.), meaning that we perform the same analysis as the trial court (see People v. Miles, 2017 IL App (1st) 132719, ¶ 19 ). ¶ 30 The State raises three potential procedural bars to defendant’s section 2-1401 petition; namely, that defendant (1) filed his petition after the two-year limitations period of section 2- 1401(c), (2) forfeited his challenge to his sentence by failing to raise it during postconviction proceedings, and (3) failed to establish that he acted with due | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2020Then, “[s]everal weeks after deciding Castleberry, the supreme court in [People v. Thompson, 2015 IL 118151 ,] addressed a voidness challenge under section 2- 1401. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Real v. Kim
green
2 sentences2016“The plain language of section 1 provides that there will be no liability under the Wrongful Death Act unless the decedent could have maintained an action for damages ‘if death had not ensued [citation],’ and the supreme court has consistently 17 1-14-3189 acknowledged and given effect to this unambiguous provision.” (Emphasis added.) Id. (quoting Ill. 2016As to the wrongful death claim, the court noted that the plaintiff misapprehended the distinction between the two-year limitations period under section 2 of the Wrongful Death Act and “the fact that there is no liability under the Act unless the condition precedent specified by section 1 has been fulfilled.” Id. at 432 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Jaqueline M.
green
1 sentence2010Specifically, we understand the State’s position to be a concession that “the State failed to prove that a safety plan existed, that respondent understood it, or that respondent violated it.” 382 Ill. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
In Re Marriage of Morreale
green
1 sentence2008In re Marriage of Morreale, 351 Ill. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
People v. McClure
neutral
1 sentence2006We allowed the State’s petition for leave to appeal after the appellate court reversed the circuit court of Tazewell County’s judgment and determined that section 13 — 217 of the Code of Civil Procedure tolled the limitations period of section 2 — 118.1(b) of the Vehicle Code. 355 Ill. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Bernier v. Burris
green
2 sentences2005We therefore find that Knauerhaze has failed to meet his burden of “clearly establishing fa] constitutional violation.” Bernier, 113 Ill. 2d at 227 , 497 N.E.2d at 767 . 2005We therefore find that Knauerhaze has failed to meet his burden of “clearly establishing fa] constitutional violation.” Bernier, 113 Ill. 2d at 227 , 497 N.E.2d at 767 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Nowalski v. Ford Motor Co.
green
1 sentence2004Nowalski, 335 Ill. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Broadnax v. Morrow
green
1 sentence2004Broadnax v. Morrow, 326 Ill. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
In Re Marriage of Stefiniw
green
1 sentence2003Sarkissian, 201 Ill. 2d at 104 , 776 N.E.2d at 201-02 ; In re Marriage of Stefiniw, 253 Ill. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Education
green
2 sentences2003Sarkissian, 201 Ill. 2d at 104 , 776 N.E.2d at 201-02 ; In re Marriage of Stefiniw, 253 Ill. 2003Sarkissian, 201 Ill. 2d at 104 , 776 N.E.2d at 201-02 ; In re Marriage of Stefiniw, 253 Ill. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| Lipinski v. Martin J. Kelly Oldsmobile, Inc. green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| DeSalvo v. Industrial Commission neutral | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Best v. Taylor MacHine Works green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Reynolds v. Burns green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Cohen v. Wood Bros. Steel Stamping Co. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Choate v. Unknown Heirs of Cole neutral | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Swinford v. Roper green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Village of Franklin Park v. Ogilvie green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Theodorakakis v. Kogut green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Dils v. City of Chicago green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Parrish v. Glen Ellyn Savings & Loan Ass'n green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Chestnut v. Adeli green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Eisenmann v. Cantor Bros., Inc. green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co. green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| People Ex Rel. Carey v. Bentivenga green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| People v. Bradley green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Chicago & Southern Airlines, Inc. v. Volpar, Inc. green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| The People v. Moe neutral | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.