Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
52 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Copenhefergreen2 sentences2019A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)-(iii) applies.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (citations and footnote omitted). 2018A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)- ____________________________________________ 12 Because we agree with the PCRA court that Attorney Hoy was not appointed as counsel and that the docket erroneously indicated that Attorney Hoy filed a response to the PCRA court’s Rule 907 notice, we need not consider whether Attorney Hoy’s alleged abandonment constituted a time-bar exception under Bennett. -9- J-S02026-18 (iii) applies.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (pa. 2007) (ci | 48 | 48 |
Commonwealth v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2017Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(3), “[a] judgment becomes final at the conclusion of direct review by this Court or the United States Supreme Court, or at the expiration of the time seeking such review.” Commonwealth v. Jones, 54 A.3d 14, 17 (Pa. 2012) (citations omitted). 2017Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(3), “[a] judgment becomes final at the conclusion of direct review by this Court or the United States Supreme Court, or at the expiration of the time seeking such review.” Commonwealth v. Jones, 54 A.3d 14, 17 (Pa. 2012) (citations omitted). | 5 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Whitneyred2 sentences2017Commonwealth v. Whitney, 817 A.2d 473, 477-78 (Pa. 2003) (citations omitted). -3- J-S13044-17 A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)- (iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (some citations and footnote omitted). 2017Commonwealth v. Whitney, 817 A.2d 473, 477-78 (Pa. 2003) (citations omitted). -3- J-S18045-17 A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)- (iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (some citations and footnote omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Derricksongreen1 sentence2025See Commonwealth v. Derrickson, 923 A.2d 466, 468 (Pa. Super. 2007) (“Without jurisdiction, we simply do not have the legal authority to address the substantive claims.”) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Kretchmargreen1 sentence2017Commonwealth v. Kretchmar, 971 A.2d 1249, 1251 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citing Commonwealth v. Murray, 753 A.2d 201 (Pa. 2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. B.D.G.green1 sentence2016Commonwealth v. B.D.G., 959 A.2d 362, 371 (Pa. Super. 2008). -3- J-S42036-16 A timely PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)-(iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (internal citations and footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamalgreen1 sentence2016Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 941 A.2d 1263, 1267-68 (Pa. 2008). -5- J-S13034-16 A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)- (iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (citations and footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Wilsongreen1 sentence2016See generally Commonwealth v. Wilson, 911 A.2d 942 , 944 n.2 (Pa. Super. 2006) (discussing prisoner mailbox rule). 4 The PCRA court did not comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 907. -2- J-S29041-16 could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer, 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (citations and footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Bundy v. Beardgreen2 sentences2008“A PCRA petition, including a second or subsequent one, must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final, unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(l)(i)-(iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Id. 941 A.2d at 648 (citing 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(l)(i)-(iii); 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(2)) (footnote omitted). 5 “A judgment becomes final at the conclusion of *1171 direct review, including discretionary review, or at the expiration of time for seeking such review.” Id. 941 A.2d at 649 , note 5 (citing 42 Pa.C.S. 2008“A PCRA petition, including a second or subsequent one, must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final, unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(l)(i)-(iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Id. 941 A.2d at 648 (citing 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(l)(i)-(iii); 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(2)) (footnote omitted). 5 “A judgment becomes final at the conclusion of *1171 direct review, including discretionary review, or at the expiration of time for seeking such review.” Id. 941 A.2d at 649 , note 5 (citing 42 Pa.C.S. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Murray
red
2 sentences2017Commonwealth v. Kretchmar, 971 A.2d 1249, 1251 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citing Commonwealth v. Murray, 753 A.2d 201 (Pa. 2000)). 2009Commonwealth v. Murray, 562 Pa. 1 , 753 A.2d 201 (2000). ¶ 8 Appellant’s appeal centers upon the usage at his trial of a forensic technique known as Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis (“CBLA”). 2 The CBLA process derived from the nature of bullet manufacturing. | 2 | 2009–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.