Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
40 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.green2 sentences2010Mobil Oil Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 288 Ill. 2010Mobil Oil Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 288 Ill. | 6 | 10 |
Buckner v. Causeygreen2 sentences2018Buckner , 311 Ill. 2014Buckner v. Causey, 311 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire Insurancegreen2 sentences2010Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire Insurance Co., 143 Ill. 1992App. 3d 643, 659 , 525 N.E.2d 94, 105 , appeal denied (1988), 122 Ill. 2d 576 , 530 N.E.2d 247 , the court noted that in deciding whether to award attorney fees pursuant to section 155, “a circuit court should consider the insurer’s attitude, whether an insured was forced to file suit to recover, and if an insured was deprived of the use of his property.” The Kohlmeier court also quoted from Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire Insurance Co. (1986), 143 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
Employers Insurance v. Ehlco Liquidating Trustgreen2 sentences2015Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Ehlco Liquidating Trust, 186 Ill. 2d 127, 160 (1999). 2015Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Ehlco Liquidating Trust, 186 Ill. 2d 127, 160 (1999). | 2 | 2 |
Peerless Enterprise, Inc. v. Krusegreen2 sentences2001App. 3d 133, 139, 738 N.E.2d 988, 995 (2000) (in which this court reviewed trial court awards of attorney fees under section 155). 2001App. 3d 133, 139 , 738 N.E.2d 988, 995 (2000) (in which this court reviewed trial court awards of attorney fees under section 155). | 2 | 2 |
Cramer v. Insurance Exchange Agencygreen2 sentences2023Citing Cramer v. Insurance Exchange Agency, 174 Ill. 2d 513 (1996) and Kroutil v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2021 IL App (4th) 210238 , the court concluded that plaintiff could not recover section 155 attorney fees, costs, and statutory damages without a successful “action on the policy.” The court explained that section 155 does not create liability; it merely provides an extracontractual “remedy for policyholders who have suffered unreasonable and vexatious conduct by insurers with respect to a claim under the policy.” ¶ 14 Plaintiff timely appealed. ¶ 15 II. 2023Citing Cramer v. Insurance Exchange Agency, 174 Ill. 2d 513 (1996), and Kroutil v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2021 IL App (4th) 210238 , the court concluded that plaintiff could not recover section 155 attorney fees, costs, and statutory damages without a successful “action on the policy.” The court explained that section 155 does not create liability; it merely provides an extracontractual “remedy for policyholders who have suffered unreasonable and vexatious conduct by insurers with respect to a claim under the policy.” ¶ 13 Plaintiff timely appealed. ¶ 14 II. | 1 | 4 |
Green v. International Insurancegreen1 sentence2024Arrow sought damages and attorney fees pursuant to section 155 of the Illinois Insurance Code (Insurance Code) (215 ILCS 5/155 (West 2008)), which “provides a remedy for an insured who encounters unnecessary difficulties when an insurer withholds policy benefits.” Green v. International Insurance Co., 238 Ill. App. 3d 929, 935 (1992). ¶ 18 Following cross-motions for summary judgment and BITCO’s motion to reconsider, the trial court granted BITCO judgment on its claims and denied Arrow’s claims. | 1 | 1 |
Dark v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.green1 sentence2023“While the question of whether the insurer’s action and delay are vexatious and unreasonable is a factual one, it is a matter for the discretion of the trial court; the trial court’s determination will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is demonstrated in the record.” Dark v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 175 Ill. App. 3d 26, 30-31 (1988). ¶ 86 Based on our above-stated analysis in this case and determinations that the circuit court did not err in concluding that (1) Shelter Mutual owed no duty to defend or indemnify Flynn in connection with the March 16, 2017 collision, a | 1 | 1 |
Statewide Insurance v. Houston General Insurancegreen1 sentence2014Statewide Insurance Co. v. Houston General Insurance Co., 397 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
American States Ins. Co. v. CFM Const. Co.green1 sentence2013Cramer v. Insurance Exchange Agency, 174 Ill. 2d 513, 523-24 (1996). ¶ 29 “An insurer will not be liable for attorney fees and costs under section 155 of the [Insurance] Code merely because it litigated and lost the issue of insurance coverage.” American States Insurance Co. v. CFM Construction Co., 398 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Purlee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurancegreen | 1 | 1 |
Boyd v. United Farm Mutual Reinsurance Co.green2 sentences1997Boyd v. United Farm Mutual Reinsurance Co., 231 Ill.App.3d 992 , 173 Ill.Dec. 465, 470 , 596 N.E.2d 1344, 1349 (1992). 1997Boyd v. United Farm Mutual Reinsurance Co., 231 Ill.App.3d 992 , 173 Ill.Dec. 465, 470 , 596 N.E.2d 1344, 1349 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
| City of Riverside v. Riveragreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Calcagno v. Personalcare Health Management, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010App. 3d 493, 505 , 565 N.E.2d 1330 (1991) (finding an insurer that paid the underlying claim prior to being sued still may be held liable for section 155 fees where the insurer unreasonably delayed settling the claim). 2010App. 3d 493, 505 , 565 N.E.2d 1330 (1991) (finding an insurer that paid the underlying claim prior to being sued still may be held liable for section 155 fees where the insurer unreasonably delayed settling the claim). | 3 | 1992–2010 |
O'Neill v. Gallant Insurance
green
2 sentences2018We disagree. ¶ 94 Section 155 allows attorney fees in favor of a successful plaintiff who shows that the conduct of an insurance company with respect to a claim is "vexatious or unreasonable." Section 155 states in pertinent part: "(1) In any action by or against a company wherein there is in issue the liability of a company on a policy or policies of insurance or the amount of the loss payable thereunder, or for an unreasonable delay in settling a claim, and it appears to the court that such action or delay is vexatious and unreasonable, the court may allow as part of the taxable costs in the 2018We disagree. ¶ 94 Section 155 allows attorney fees in favor of a successful plaintiff who shows that the conduct of an insurance company with respect to a claim is “vexatious or unreasonable.” Section 155 states in pertinent part: “(1) In any action by or against a company wherein there is in issue the liability of a company on a policy or policies of insurance or the amount of the loss payable thereunder, or for an unreasonable delay in settling a claim, and it appears to the court that such action or delay is vexatious and unreasonable, the court may allow as part of the taxable costs in the | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Father & Sons, Inc. v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2010And, we find Amerisure’s reliance on Father & Sons, Inc. v. Taylor, 301 Ill. 2010And, we find Amerisure’s reliance on Father & Sons, Inc. v. Taylor, 301 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Beatty v. Doctors' Co.
green
2 sentences2010App. 3d 558 , 871 N.E.2d 138 (2007), to support its contention that Illinois courts have allowed arbitrators to award section 155 attorney fees. 2010App. 3d 558 , 871 N.E.2d 138 (2007), to support its contention that Illinois courts have allowed arbitrators to award section 155 attorney fees. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick
green
2 sentences2010First Health Group Corp., 393 Ill. 2010First Health Group Corp., 393 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010Although an arbitration panel need not disclose its basis for an award (Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc., 229 Ill. 2010Turning to the substance of this appeal, Global contends the arbitrators exceeded their authority because (1) they awarded attorney fees on a basis the parties did not submit for resolution, and (2) Illinois law does not authorize arbitrators to award section 155 attorney fees. -17- 1-09-0820 Although an arbitration panel need not disclose its basis for an award (Edward Electric Co. v. Automation Inc., 229 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Estate of Price v. Universal Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences2010If the insurance company vexatiously delays or rejects legitimate claims, it is responsible for the expense resulting from the insured’s efforts to prosecute the claim. [Citation.] When an insured must resort to bringing a declaratory action against the insurer in order to enforce its right to coverage in an underlying lawsuit, the insured may recover section 155 attorney fees incurred in both the underlying case and the declaratory action. [Citation.]” (Emphasis added.) Estate of Price v. Universal Casualty Co., 334 Ill. 2010If the insurance company vexatiously delays or rejects legitimate claims, it is responsible for the expense resulting from the insured’s efforts to prosecute the claim. [Citation.] When an insured must resort to bringing a declaratory action against the insurer in order to enforce its right to coverage in an underlying lawsuit, the insured may recover section 155 attorney fees incurred in both the underlying case and the declaratory action. [Citation.]” (Emphasis added.) Estate of Price v. Universal Casualty Co., 334 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
American Service Insurance v. Passarelli
green
2 sentences2010Moreover, this court has held that a party may not “recover attorneys fees under section 155 by way of an arbitration proceeding.” American Service Insurance Co. v. Passarelli, 323 Ill. 2010Moreover, this court has held that a party may not “recover attorneys fees under section 155 by way of an arbitration proceeding.” American Service Insurance Co. v. Passarelli, 323 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Marcheschi v. Illinois Farmers Insurance
green
2 sentences2002Marcheschi , 298 Ill. 2002Marcheschi, 298 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Garland A. Holbrook and Truck Acceptance Corporation v. Institutional Insurance Company of America
green
2 sentences1997Purlee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 260 Ill.App.3d 11, 32 , 197 Ill.Dec. 430, 445 , 631 N.E.2d 433, 448 (1994), citing Holbrook v. Institutional Insurance Co., 369 F.2d 236 (7th Cir.1966). 1994Moreover, where there is a question as to whether a policy was in effect at the time of loss, an insurer's refusal to pay a claim has been held not to be vexatious and without reasonable cause and the insurer is not liable for attorney fees under section 155. ( Holbrook v. Institutional Insurance Co. (7th Cir.1966), 369 F.2d 236 .) The record indicates that defendant had a legitimate defense to a finding of underinsured motorist coverage under each plaintiff's policy. | 2 | 1994–1997 |
Buais v. Safeway Insurance
green
2 sentences1997Buais, 275 Ill. 1997Buais v. Safeway Insurance Co., 275 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Shell Oil Co. v. AC & S, INC.
green
2 sentences1997Shell Oil, 271 Ill. 1997Shell Oil, 271 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Moles v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2023CONCLUSION ¶ 30 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County. ¶ 31 Affirmed. - 12 - Moles v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co., 2023 IL App (1st) 220853 Decision Under Review: Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 18-L-11082; the Hon. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Korte Construction Co. v. American States Insurance
green
1 sentence2018The purpose of section 155 is to provide a remedy to insureds who encounter unnecessary difficulties resulting from an insurance company's vexatious and unreasonable refusal to honor its contract with the insured. *527 Korte Construction Co. v. American States Insurance , 322 Ill. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
LaGrange Memorial Hosp. v. St. Paul Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 873 . ¶ 115 La Grange is distinguishable from the instant case in two ways. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Peleton, Inc. v. McGivern's, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014As an order awarding attorney fees generally will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion (Peleton, 375 Ill. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007Steadfast I, 359 Ill. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Myrda v. Coronet Insurance
green
1 sentence2000Valdovinos , No. 2--99--0799, slip op. at 7-8, relying on Myrda , 221 Ill. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Valdovinos v. Gallant Insurance
green
1 sentence2000Valdovinos, 314 Ill. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Kohlmeier v. Shelter Insurance Co. green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| County of Winnebago v. Industrial Commission green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Hall v. Svea Mutual Insurance Co. green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.