section 2-1401 civil remedy (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

section 2-1401 civil remedy in Illinois

40 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 21 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Vincentgreen
ill · 2007 · cited in 20 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2009–2026
2 sentences

2020Thus, we cite in this opinion to the latest version of the statute. -7- ¶ 33 Since section 2-1401 is a civil remedy, it is “subject to the usual rules of civil practice.” Vincent, 226 Ill. 2d at 8.

2014It stated that this "observation" had been true when such relief was available under common law writs but, when the legislature abolished the writs in favor of the section 2-1401 statutory remedy, "it became inaccurate to continue to view the relief in 27 1-12-1424 strictly equitable terms" and "relief [under section 2-1401] is no longer purely discretionary." Vincent, 226 Ill. 2d at 16 . ¶ 58 The Vincent holding notwithstanding, courts have created equitable exceptions to the due diligence requirement of section 2-1401.

920
People v. Sanchezgreen
ill · 1989 · cited in 3 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2007–2024
2 sentences

2024People v. Sanchez, 131 Ill.2d 417, 420 (1989).

2020People v. Sanchez, 131 Ill. 2d 417, 420 (1989).

23
People v. Thomasgreen
illappct · 2006 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2012–2021
2 sentences

2021Though section 2-1401 provides a civil remedy, it extends to criminal cases where a defendant may seek to “correct all errors of fact occurring in the prosecution of a case, that were unknown to the petitioner and the court at the time of trial, which, if then known, would have prevented the judgment from being entered.” People v. Thomas, 364 Ill. App. 3d 91, 98 (2006).

2012Perjury “A criminal conviction obtained through the State’s knowing use of false testimony constitutes a violation of due process. [Citation.] A defendant seeking relief from a judgment based on false testimony may do so under section 2-1401 and need not -5- establish that the prosecution knowingly used false testimony. [Citation.] Where a criminal defendant seeks to overturn his conviction on the basis of perjured testimony, the defendant must not merely allege perjury by State’s witnesses, but must present clear, factual allegations of perjury and not mere conclusions or opinions.” Thomas, 3

12
People v. Clemonsgreen
illappct · 2023 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026People v. Clemons, 2023 IL App (1st) 192169, ¶ 21.

11
Helmig v. John F. Kennedy Community Consolidated School District No. 129green
illappct · 1993 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015It stated that this “observation” had been true when such relief was available under common law writs but, when the legislature abolished the writs in favor of the section 2-1401 statutory remedy, “it 9 “[A] plaintiff has standing if he is able to show some injury in fact to a legally recognized interest. [Citation.] A proponent must assert his own legal rights and interests, rather than basing his claim for relief upon the rights of third parties.” Helmig v. John F. Kennedy Community Consolidated School District No. 129, 241 Ill.

11
People v. Lawtongreen
ill · 2004 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See People v. Lawton, 212 Ill. 2d 285, 287 (2004) (recognizing that the statutory language of section 2-1401 does not expressly limit its application to errors of fact, and holding that a section 2-1401 petition is a viable mechanism for bringing ineffective assistance of counsel claims where relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is unavailable). ¶ 22 Instead, on appeal, the State argues against the merits of the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

11
Davis v. Chicago Transit Authoritygreen
illappct · 1980 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009App. 3d 374, 381 (1984); Davis v. Chicago Transit Authority, 82 Ill.

11
In Re Marriage of Ohlsongreen
illappct · 1984 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009App. 3d at 483 (“The section 2-1401 remedy was not intended to put in issue matters that previously could have been adjudicated”); In re Marriage of Ohlson, 126 Ill.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Smith v. Airoom, Inc. green
ill · 1986
2 sentences

2026But under these facts, we cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion in finding due diligence. ¶ 30 Finally, section 2-1401 is an equitable remedy, and a court may vacate a default even absent strict compliance with the due diligence requirements “where justice and good conscience may require it.” Smith, 114 Ill. 2d at 225 .

2021Smith, 114 Ill. 2d at 221 . 4 ¶ 12 Although section 2-1401 provides a civil remedy, it is available in both civil and criminal cases.

22021–2026
People v. Stoecker green
ill · 2020
2 sentences

2026People v. Stoecker, 2020 IL 124807, ¶ 18 .

2023Stoecker, 2020 IL 124807, ¶ 18 .

22023–2026
People v. De Leon green
illappct · 2009
2 sentences

2021People v. De Leon, 387 Ill.

2021People v. De Leon, 387 Ill.

22021–2021
People v. Brown green
ill · 1995
2 sentences

2016In Brown, our supreme court pointed out that a remedy under section 2-1401 does not require a defendant "to establish a constitutional violation or, in the case of false testimony, that the false testimony was knowingly used by the prosecution." Brown, 169 Ill. 2d at 107 .

1996As this court explained in People v. Brown, 169 Ill.2d 94 , 107-08, 214 Ill.

21996–2016
People v. Harvey green
ill · 2001
2 sentences

2003People v. Harvey, 196 Ill.2d 444, 447 , 257 Ill.Dec. 98 , 753 N.E.2d 293 (2001) (stating that section 2-1401 provides a civil remedy, which also applies to criminal cases).

2003People v. Harvey, 196 Ill.2d 444, 447 , 257 Ill.Dec. 98 , 753 N.E.2d 293 (2001) (stating that section 2-1401 provides a civil remedy, which also applies to criminal cases).

22003–2003
Excalibur Energy Co. v. Rochman neutral
illappct · 2015
1 sentence

2026App. 2d 242, 245 (1970) (suit to quiet title is not the proper proceeding to consider a collateral attack upon a judgment of the county court issuing a tax deed). 9 ¶ 26 More recently, in Excalibur Energy Co. v. Rochman, 2014 IL App (5th) 130524 , this court reaffirmed that, pursuant to section 22-45 of the Property Tax Code, section 2-1401 was the sole remedy to set aside a tax deed more than 30 days after the judgment.

12026–2026
Stolfo v. Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc. green
illappct · 2016
1 sentence

2021The petition is filed in the same proceeding as the challenged judgment, but is a separate collateral action, not a continuation of the original proceeding. 735 ILCS 5/2-1401(b) (West 2016); Stolfo v. KinderCare Learning Ctrs., Inc., 2016 IL App (1st) 142396, ¶ 25 .

12021–2021
People v. Haynes green
ill · 2000
1 sentence

2021Haynes, 192 Ill. 2d at 461 .

12021–2021
People v. Pinkonsly green
ill · 2003
1 sentence

2021Pinkonsly, 207 Ill. 2d at 267-268 .- While the court has no duty to appoint counsel to represent the petitioner, it may do so at its discretion.

12021–2021
Cavalry Portfolio Services v. Rocha green
illappct · 2012
2 sentences

2014Fanady cites to Cavalry Portfolio Services, 2012 IL App (1st) 111690 , in which the court held: "a trial court ruling denying section 2-1401 relief can be vacated even in the absence of diligence where the defendant has a meritorious defense and actively seeks to vacate the judgment. [Citation.] More important than the due diligence requirement is the requirement that substantial justice be achieved." Cavalry Portfolio Services, 2012 IL App (1st) 111690, ¶ 18 .

2014Fanady cites to Cavalry Portfolio Services, 2012 IL App (1st) 111690 , in which the court held: "a trial court ruling denying section 2-1401 relief can be vacated even in the absence of diligence where the defendant has a meritorious defense and actively seeks to vacate the judgment. [Citation.] More important than the due diligence requirement is the requirement that substantial justice be achieved." Cavalry Portfolio Services, 2012 IL App (1st) 111690, ¶ 18 .

12014–2014
People v. Hinton green
ill · 1972
2 sentences

2007People v. Sanchez, 131 Ill.2d 417, 420 , 137 Ill.Dec. 629 , 546 N.E.2d 574 (1989); People v. Hinton, 52 Ill.2d 239 , 287 N.E.2d 657 (1972).

2007People v. Sanchez, 131 Ill.2d 417, 420 , 137 Ill.Dec. 629 , 546 N.E.2d 574 (1989); People v. Hinton, 52 Ill.2d 239 , 287 N.E.2d 657 (1972).

12007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-1401 (36) IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-1 (15) IL § 730 ILCS 5/5-8-1 (4) IL § 730 ILCS 5/5-8-4 (4) IL § 720 ILCS 5/8-4 (3) IL § 720 ILCS 570/401 (3) IL § 725 ILCS 5/116-3 (3) IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-2 (3) IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-2.1 (3) IL § 730 ILCS 5/5-8-2 (3) IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-1203 (3) IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-615 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check