Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
35 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1943–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fink v. Ryangreen2 sentences2013I, § 6; see Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 (1996) (“This court has construed the search and seizure language found in section 6 in a manner that is consistent with the Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence.”). 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 15 | 17 |
People v. Gonzalezred2 sentences2004See Gonzalez , 204 Ill. 2d at 224 , 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court's fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden , 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull , 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan , 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell , 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente , 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler , 10 2004See Gonzalez , 204 Ill. 2d at 224 , 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court's fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden , 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull , 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan , 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell , 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente , 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler , 10 | 12 | 12 |
People v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 8 | 8 |
People v. Tislergreen2 sentences2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 6 | 6 |
People v. Bullgreen2 sentences2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 4 | 4 |
People v. Boldengreen2 sentences2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 4 | 4 |
People v. Lucentegreen2 sentences2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 2004See Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d at 224, 789 N.E.2d at 264 (Illinois Supreme Court construes the search and seizure language in section 6 in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 179 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 (1987); People v. Tisler, 103 Ill. 2 | 4 | 4 |
People v. Pitmangreen2 sentences2023People v. Pittman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 (2004). ¶ 31 This case involves an encounter between a private citizen and a police officer on a public street, and it is governed by Terry. 2005See Smith, 214 Ill. 2d at 349 , 827 N,E.2d at 451; People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 , 813 N.E.2d 93, 101 (2004); People v. Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d 220, 224 , 789 N.E.2d 260, 264 (2003); People v. Gherna, 203 Ill. 2d 165, 176 , 784 N.E.2d 799, 806 (2003); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 178-79 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 | 3 | 3 |
People v. Ghernagreen2 sentences2005See Smith, 214 Ill. 2d at 349 , 827 N,E.2d at 451; People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 , 813 N.E.2d 93, 101 (2004); People v. Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d 220, 224 , 789 N.E.2d 260, 264 (2003); People v. Gherna, 203 Ill. 2d 165, 176 , 784 N.E.2d 799, 806 (2003); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 178-79 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 2005See Smith, 214 Ill. 2d at 349 , 827 N,E.2d at 451; People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 , 813 N.E.2d 93, 101 (2004); People v. Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d 220, 224 , 789 N.E.2d 260, 264 (2003); People v. Gherna, 203 Ill. 2d 165, 176 , 784 N.E.2d 799, 806 (2003); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 178-79 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 | 2 | 4 |
People v. Caballesgreen2 sentences2009People v. Caballes, 221 Ill. 2d 282 , 851 N.E.2d 26 (2006). 2009People v. Caballes, 221 Ill. 2d 282 , 851 N.E.2d 26 (2006). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Smithgreen2 sentences2005See Smith , 214 Ill. 2d at 349 , 827 N.E.2d at 451 ; People v. Pitman , 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 , 813 N.E.2d 93, 101 (2004); People v. Gonzalez , 204 Ill. 2d 220, 224 , 789 N.E.2d 260, 264 (2003); People v. Gherna , 203 Ill. 2d 165, 176 , 784 N.E.2d 799, 806 (2003); People v. Bolden , 197 Ill. 2d 166, 178-79 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull , 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan , 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell , 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente , 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1 2005See Smith, 214 Ill. 2d at 349 , 827 N,E.2d at 451; People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 513 , 813 N.E.2d 93, 101 (2004); People v. Gonzalez, 204 Ill. 2d 220, 224 , 789 N.E.2d 260, 264 (2003); People v. Gherna, 203 Ill. 2d 165, 176 , 784 N.E.2d 799, 806 (2003); People v. Bolden, 197 Ill. 2d 166, 178-79 , 756 N.E.2d 812, 820 (2001); People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179, 196 , 705 N.E.2d 824, 833 (1998); Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 , 673 N.E.2d 281, 288 (1996); People v. Mitchell, 165 Ill. 2d 211, 219 , 650 N.E.2d 1014, 1018 (1995); People v. Lucente, 116 Ill. 2d 133, 146 , 506 N.E.2d 1269, 1274 | 2 | 2 |
People v. Anthonygreen2 sentences2003I, sec. 6; see People v. Anthony , 198 Ill. 2d 194, 201 (2001) (“ ‘This court has construed the search and seizure language found in section 6 in a manner that is consistent with the Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence’ ”), quoting Fink v. Ryan , 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 (1996). 2003I, sec. 6; see People v. Anthony, 198 Ill. 2d 194, 201 (2001) (“ ‘This court has construed the search and seizure language found in section 6 in a manner that is consistent with the Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence’ ”), quoting Fink v. Ryan, 174 Ill. 2d 302, 314 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Nesbitt
green
2 sentences2011In other words, Caballes does not require application of limited lockstep analysis when determining the parameters of the Illinois Constitution's privacy provision." (Emphasis omitted.) Nesbitt, 405 Ill.App.3d at 828 , 345 Ill.Dec. 161 , 938 N.E.2d 600 . 2011In other words, Caballes does not require application of limited lockstep analysis when determining the parameters of the Illinois Constitution’s privacy provision.” (Emphasis omitted.) Nesbitt, 405 Ill. App. 3d at 828 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Katz v. United States
green
2 sentences2003Because “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places” (Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 , 19 L. 2003Because “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places” (Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 , 19 L. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead
green
1 sentence1952(National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead, 250 Ill. 584 .) The inclusion of this provision merely means that the Department may enter licensed premises to examine records and related physical inventories of cigarettes, and this type of provision in tax laws would authorize entry without a warrant even if the phrase “without a search warrant” had not been used. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
The People v. Martin
green
1 sentence1943This question, under very similar facts, was before this court in the case of People v. Martin, 382 Ill. 192 , where it was held, in a case of illegal seizure of the defendant’s files, that a motion to suppress all evidence arising from information gleaned from such illegally seized records, should be allowed. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.