Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
32 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mistler v. Mistlergreen2 sentences2000Id. at 951 [9], A trial court’s division of marital property must be fair and equitable and take into account the factors enumerated in § 452.330.1. 8 Mistier, 816 S.W.2d at 252 [8]. 1999Mistler, 816 S.W.2d at 252 [8]. | 7 | 7 |
Carter v. Cartergreen2 sentences2000Carter v. Carter, 940 S.W.2d 12,16 (Mo.App.1997). 2000The circuit court’s obligation is to divide the marital property fairly according to the factors enumerated in § 452.330.1. 2 Carter v. Carter, 940 S.W.2d 12, 16 (Mo.App.1997). | 3 | 3 |
McKee v. McKeegreen2 sentences2000Id. at 951 [9], A trial court’s division of marital property must be fair and equitable and take into account the factors enumerated in § 452.330.1. 8 Mistier, 816 S.W.2d at 252 [8]. 1999McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 951 . | 1 | 3 |
Nelson v. Nelsongreen2 sentences2002“Equal division of property is not required, but the division of property should be reasonable, taking into account the factors enumerated in section 452.330.1.” Myers, 47 S.W.3d at 407 ; see also In re Marriage of Pahlow, 39 S.W.3d 87, 91 (Mo.App.2001). " In dividing the marital property of Husband and Wife, the trial court must consider the following relevant factors: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the sp 2001Nelson, 25 S.W.3d at 517 . | 1 | 2 |
Floyd R. Finch v. Joann K. Finchgreen1 sentence2017Finch v. Finch, 442 S.W.3d 209, 215 (Mo. App. W.D. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Dardick v. Dardickgreen1 sentence2017Dardick v. Dardick, 670 S.W.2d 865, 869 (Mo. banc 1984). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Fuldnergreen1 sentence2005In re Fuldner, 41 S.W.3d 581, 594 (Mo.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Holdengreen1 sentence2003The trial court abuses its discretion only when its ruling is “clearly against the logic of the circumstances and is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to shock one’s sense of justice and indicate a lack of careful consideration.” In re Marriage of Holden 81 S.W.3d 217, 225 (Mo.App.2002). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Gilmoregreen1 sentence2002In re Marriage of Gilmore, 943 S.W.2d 866, 876-77 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Pahlowgreen1 sentence2002“Equal division of property is not required, but the division of property should be reasonable, taking into account the factors enumerated in section 452.330.1.” Myers, 47 S.W.3d at 407 ; see also In re Marriage of Pahlow, 39 S.W.3d 87, 91 (Mo.App.2001). " In dividing the marital property of Husband and Wife, the trial court must consider the following relevant factors: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the sp | 1 | 1 |
Kinsey-Geujen v. Geujengreen1 sentence2001As stated in Kinsey-Geujen v. Geujen, 984 S.W.2d 577, 581 (Mo.App.1999): “Equal division of marital property is not the benchmark of a proper division of property!;]” rather, fairness is. | 1 | 1 |
Ware v. Waregreen1 sentence1999Ware v. Ware, 647 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Mo.App.1983). | 1 | 1 |
Crews v. Crewsgreen1 sentence1998Crews v. Crews, 949 S.W.2d 659, 665 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Jenningsgreen1 sentence1998Id; In re Marriage of Jennings, 910 S.W.2d 760, 765 (Mo.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Cofer v. Price-Cofergreen1 sentence1994Cofer v. Price-Cofer, 825 S.W.2d 369, 374 [4] (Mo. App.S.D.1992); Mistler v. Mistler, 816 S.W.2d 241, 252 [8] (Mo.App.S.D.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Harrison v. Cartergreen1 sentence1991In re Marriage of Harrison, 657 S.W.2d 366, 370 (Mo.App.1983). | 1 | 1 |
Hayes v. Hayesgreen1 sentence1991Hayes v. Hayes, 792 S.W.2d 428, 431 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
McDonough v. McDonoughgreen1 sentence1991Under § 452.330, the conduct of the parties during the marriage is enumerated under § 452.330 as a factor for a court to consider in the division of marital property, and a “disparity in the value of marital property awarded to each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors of Section 452.330.1 justify an unequal distribution.” McDonough v. McDonough, 762 S.W.2d 827, 830 (Mo.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Marriage of Cain v. Caingreen1 sentence1977Cain v. Cain, 536 S.W.2d 866, 874 (Mo.App.1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hampton v. Davenport
green
1 sentence2004Here, as in Hampton v. Davenport, 86 S.W.3d 494 (Mo.App.2002), Rule 84.04(d)(1) applies to what is required for husband’s points relied on. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Marriage of Kirkwood v. Kirkwood
green
1 sentence2003The resulting division of marital property need not be equal, although it must be equitable after taking into account the factors enumerated in section 452.330.1 and any other relevant factors. 1 Kirkwood 77 S.W.3d at 680 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Kester v. Kester
green
1 sentence2003Kester, 108 S.W.3d at 224 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Shepard v. Shepard
green
2 sentences2002“However, the trial court may attach the amount of weight to each of these it deems appropriate, and these factors are not exclusive.” Shepard, 47 S.W.3d at 417 . 2002“Equal division of property is not required, but the division of property should be reasonable, taking into account the factors enumerated in section 452.330.1.” Myers, 47 S.W.3d at 407 ; see also In re Marriage of Pahlow, 39 S.W.3d 87, 91 (Mo.App.2001). " In dividing the marital property of Husband and Wife, the trial court must consider the following relevant factors: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the sp | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Myers v. Myers
green
1 sentence2002“Equal division of property is not required, but the division of property should be reasonable, taking into account the factors enumerated in section 452.330.1.” Myers, 47 S.W.3d at 407 ; see also In re Marriage of Pahlow, 39 S.W.3d 87, 91 (Mo.App.2001). " In dividing the marital property of Husband and Wife, the trial court must consider the following relevant factors: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the sp | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In Re the Marriage of Petersen
green
1 sentence2001Petersen, 22 S.W.3d at 763 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Ray v. Ray
green
1 sentence1997Ray v. Ray, 877 S.W.2d 648 (Mo.App.1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In re the Marriage of Dildy
green
1 sentence1988In re Marriage of Dildy, 737 S.W.2d 756 (Mo.App. 1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.