Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
32 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2026 27 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Interest of Jessalina M.green2 sentences2026See In re Interest of Jessalina M., 315 Neb. 535 , 997 N.W.2d 778 (2023) (existence of statutory basis alleged in § 43-292(7) should be determined as of date petition or motion to terminate filed). 2026See In re Interest of Jessalina M., 315 Neb. 535 , 997 N.W.2d 778 (2023) (existence of statutory basis alleged in § 43-292(7) should be determined as of date petition or motion to terminate filed). | 6 | 26 |
In Re Interest of Aaron D.green2 sentences2024The Nebraska Supreme Court has noted that in cases where termination is sought solely on the basis of § 43-292(7), “proof that termination is nonetheless in a juvenile’s best interests will, necessarily, require clear and convincing evidence of circumstances as compelling and pertinent to a child’s best interests as those enumerated in the other subsections of § 43-292.” In re Interest of Aaron D., 269 Neb. 249, 263 , 691 N.W.2d 164, 174 (2005). 2024The Nebraska Supreme Court has noted that in cases where termination is sought solely on the basis of § 43-292(7), “proof that termination is nonetheless in a juvenile’s best interests will, necessarily, require clear and convincing evidence of circumstances as compelling and pertinent to a child’s best interests as those enumerated in the other subsections of § 43-292.” In re Interest of Aaron D., 269 Neb. 249, 263 , 691 N.W.2d 164, 174 (2005). | 2 | 2 |
In re Interest of Jessalina M.green2 sentences2023In its determination that the statutory basis under § 43-292(7) had been shown, the Court of Appeals recognized that “[§] 43-292(7) does not specifically provide a triggering event for when the 22-month look-back period should commence.” In re Interest of Jessalina M., 32 Neb. App. at 128 , 994 N.W.2d at 124-25. 2023In its determination that the statutory basis under § 43-292(7) had been shown, the Court of Appeals recognized that “[§] 43-292(7) does not specifically provide a triggering event for when the 22-month look-back period should commence.” In re Interest of Jessalina M., 32 Neb. App. at 128 , 994 N.W.2d at 124-25. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Interest of Michael B.green2 sentences2018See, also, In re Interest of Michael B. et al., 258 Neb. 545 , 604 N.W.2d 405 (2000) (improper for State to adduce evidence of mother’s mental deficiency where it had not asserted § 43-292(5) as ground for termination; but judgment affirmed upon finding there was clear and convincing evidence independent of any mental deficiency that grounds for termination existed under § 43-292(4)). 2018See, also, In re Interest of Michael B. et al., 258 Neb. 545 , 604 N.W.2d 405 (2000) (improper for State to adduce evidence of mother’s mental deficiency where it had not asserted § 43-292(5) as ground for termination; but judgment affirmed upon finding there was clear and convincing evidence independent of any mental deficiency that grounds for termination existed under § 43-292(4)). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Interest of Natasha H.green1 sentence2000See, generally, In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., ante p. 131, 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999); In re Interest of Kassara M., ante p. 90, 601 N.W.2d 917 (1999); In re Interest of J.H., 242 Neb. 906, 497 N.W.2d 346 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Interest of Cameron L. & David L.
green
1 sentence2024Thus, the statutory requirement for termination under § 43-292(7) has been met. - 606 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports IN RE INTEREST OF CAMERON L. & DAVID L. Cite as 32 Neb. App. 578 [8] If an appellate court determines that the lower court correctly found that termination of parental rights is appropriate under one of the statutory grounds set forth in § 43-292, the appellate court need not further address the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination under any other statutory ground. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re Interest of Leyton C. & Landyn C.
green
1 sentence2020Cite as 28 Neb. App. 95 showing both that a statutory basis exists under § 43-292 and that termination is in the children’s best interests. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Interest of Lisa W.
green
2 sentences2003See, In re Interest of DeWayne G. & Devon G., supra; In re Interest of Lisa W. & Samantha W., 258 Neb. 914 , 606 N.W.2d 804 (2000). *384 The record reflects and Angela does not dispute that at the time of the termination hearing, all five of the children had been in continuous foster care for approximately 24 months, thereby satisfying the requirement under § 43-292(7) that they be in out-of-home placement for 15 of the last 22 months. 2003See, In re Interest of DeWayne G. & Devon G., supra; In re Interest of Lisa W. & Samantha W., 258 Neb. 914 , 606 N.W.2d 804 (2000). *384 The record reflects and Angela does not dispute that at the time of the termination hearing, all five of the children had been in continuous foster care for approximately 24 months, thereby satisfying the requirement under § 43-292(7) that they be in out-of-home placement for 15 of the last 22 months. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re Interest of Kassara M.
green
1 sentence2000See, generally, In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., ante p. 131, 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999); In re Interest of Kassara M., ante p. 90, 601 N.W.2d 917 (1999); In re Interest of J.H., 242 Neb. 906, 497 N.W.2d 346 (1993). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
In Re Interest of JH
green
2 sentences2000See, generally, In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., ante p. 131, 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999); In re Interest of Kassara M., ante p. 90, 601 N.W.2d 917 (1999); In re Interest of J.H., 242 Neb. 906, 497 N.W.2d 346 (1993). 2000See, generally, In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., ante p. 131, 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999); In re Interest of Kassara M., ante p. 90, 601 N.W.2d 917 (1999); In re Interest of J.H., 242 Neb. 906, 497 N.W.2d 346 (1993). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.