Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 New York opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zakhidov v. Boulevard Tenants Corp.green2 sentences2026It is well settled that "[t]he nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" ( Zakhidov v Boulevard Tenants Corp. , 96 AD3d 737 , 738 [2d Dept 2012]). 2025NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2025 "The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion (see Dimoulas v. Roca, 120 A.D.3d 1293, 1295 , 993 N.Y.S.2d 56 ; Zakhidov v. Boulevard Tenants Corp., 96 A.D.3d 737, 739 , 945 N.Y.S.2d 756 ). | 3 | 6 |
Isaacs v. Isaacsgreen2 sentences2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). 2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). | 2 | 2 |
Romeo v. Barrellagreen2 sentences2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). 2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). | 2 | 2 |
Carbajal v. Bobo Robo, Inc.green2 sentences2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). 2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). | 2 | 2 |
Dimoulas v. Rocagreen2 sentences2025NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2025 "The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion (see Dimoulas v. Roca, 120 A.D.3d 1293, 1295 , 993 N.Y.S.2d 56 ; Zakhidov v. Boulevard Tenants Corp., 96 A.D.3d 737, 739 , 945 N.Y.S.2d 756 ). 2018The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion ( see Dimoulas v Roca , 120 AD3d 1293, 1295 ; Zakhidov v Boulevard Tenants Corp ., 96 AD3d 737, 739 ). | 1 | 3 |
Ambroise v. Palmana Realty Corp.green2 sentences2022The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion ( see Ambriose v Palmana Realty Corp. , 197 AD3d 1226 ; Wolf v Flowers , 122 AD3d 728, 728-729 ; Fishbane v Chelsea Hall, LLC , 65 AD3d 1079, 1081 ). 2022Pursuant to CPLR 3126(3), a court may impose discovery sanctions, including the striking of a pleading, where a party "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or willfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed." "The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" ( Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859; see Ambroise v Palmana Realty Corp. , 197 AD3d 1226 ; Wolf v Flowers , 122 AD3d 728, 728-729 ). | 1 | 2 |
Castillo v. Charlesgreen1 sentence2025"The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" ( Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859; see Castillo v Charles , 210 AD3d 625, 626 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2022"Although public policy strongly favors that actions be resolved on the merits when possible, a court may resort to the drastic remedies of striking a pleading or precluding evidence upon a clear showing that a party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful and contumacious conduct" ( Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Jackson , 192 AD3d 813, 815 ; see Matter of Apostolidis , 193 AD3d 1039 , 1040; Marino v Armogan , 179 AD3d 664, 666 ). 2022"Although public policy strongly favors that actions be resolved on the merits when possible, a court may resort to the drastic remedies of striking a pleading or precluding evidence upon a clear showing that a party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful and contumacious conduct" ( Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Jackson , 192 AD3d 813, 815 ; see Matter of Apostolidis , 193 AD3d 1039 , 1040; Carmona v HUB Props. | 3 | 2021–2022 |
Wolf v. Flowers
green
2 sentences2022The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion ( see Ambriose v Palmana Realty Corp. , 197 AD3d 1226 ; Wolf v Flowers , 122 AD3d 728, 728-729 ; Fishbane v Chelsea Hall, LLC , 65 AD3d 1079, 1081 ). 2022Pursuant to CPLR 3126(3), a court may impose discovery sanctions, including the striking of a pleading, where a party "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or willfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed." "The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" ( Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859; see Ambroise v Palmana Realty Corp. , 197 AD3d 1226 ; Wolf v Flowers , 122 AD3d 728, 728-729 ). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Duncan v. Hebb
green
2 sentences2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). 2012The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court’s discretion (see Romeo v Barrella, 82 AD3d 1071, 1075 [2011]; Isaacs v Isaacs, 71 AD3d 951, 952 [2010]; Duncan v Hebb, 47 AD3d 871 [2008]; Carbajal v Bobo Robo, Inc., 38 AD3d 820, 821 [2007]). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Malek v. Malek
green
1 sentence2025"However, before a court invokes the drastic remedy of striking a pleading, there must be a clear showing that the failure to comply with court-ordered discovery was willful and contumacious" ( Malek v Malek , 208 AD3d 773, 774 ; see 255 Butler Assoc., LLC v 255 Butler, LLC , 208 AD3d 831 , 834). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Marino v. Armogan
green
1 sentence2022"Although public policy strongly favors that actions be resolved on the merits when possible, a court may resort to the drastic remedies of striking a pleading or precluding evidence upon a clear showing that a party's failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful and contumacious conduct" ( Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Jackson , 192 AD3d 813, 815 ; see Matter of Apostolidis , 193 AD3d 1039 , 1040; Marino v Armogan , 179 AD3d 664, 666 ). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Fishbane v. Chelsea Hall, LLC
green
1 sentence2022The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion ( see Ambriose v Palmana Realty Corp. , 197 AD3d 1226 ; Wolf v Flowers , 122 AD3d 728, 728-729 ; Fishbane v Chelsea Hall, LLC , 65 AD3d 1079, 1081 ). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS v. Occidental Gems, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021Co. , 172 AD3d 795 , 795, quoting Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859), "the Appellate Division is vested with its own discretion and corresponding power to substitute its own discretion for that of the trial court, even in the absence of abuse" ( Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Occidental Gems, Inc. , 11 NY3d 843, 845 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Viener
green
1 sentence2021Co. , 172 AD3d 795 , 795, quoting Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859), "the Appellate Division is vested with its own discretion and corresponding power to substitute its own discretion for that of the trial court, even in the absence of abuse" ( Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Occidental Gems, Inc. , 11 NY3d 843, 845 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Arpino v. F.J.F. & Sons Electric Co.
green
1 sentence2018"The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" ( Crupi v Rashid , 157 AD3d 858 , 859; see Dimoulas v Roca , 120 AD3d 1293, 1295 ; Arpino v F.J.F. & Sons Elec., Co., Inc ., 102 AD3d 201 , 210; Zakhidov v Boulevard Tenants Corp ., 96 AD3d 737, 738 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Vaughn v. City of New York
green
1 sentence2001To be distinguished from this case, the higher “conclusive evidence” standard has been loosely employed — although not defined or fully explained — to characterize a movant’s burden in establishing the willfulness of a proven or conceded spolia tion or other discovery violation under CPLR 3126 (see, Vaughn v City of New York, 201 AD2d 556, 558 ; Farrell v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 120 AD2d 778 ; Town of E. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Farrell v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
neutral
1 sentence2001To be distinguished from this case, the higher “conclusive evidence” standard has been loosely employed — although not defined or fully explained — to characterize a movant’s burden in establishing the willfulness of a proven or conceded spolia tion or other discovery violation under CPLR 3126 (see, Vaughn v City of New York, 201 AD2d 556, 558 ; Farrell v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 120 AD2d 778 ; Town of E. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.