section 7 warrants an inquiry (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

section 7 warrants an inquiry in Washington

13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Olsengreen
wash · 2017 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Article I, section 7 requires a two-pronged inquiry to determine if a violation has occurred: “(1) whether the contested state action “disturbed” a person’s ‘private affair[s]’ and, if so, (2) whether the action was undertaken with ‘authority of law.’ ” [State v. Olsen, 189 Wn.2d 118 , 123, 399 P.3d 1141 (2017)] (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Reeder, 184 Wn.2d 805, 814 , 365 P.3d 1243 (2015)). 12 No.59628-8-II State v. Nelson, ___ Wn.3d ___, 565 P.3d 906 , 916 (2025).

2025Article I, section 7 requires a two-pronged inquiry to determine if a violation has occurred: “(1) whether the contested state action “disturbed” a person’s ‘private affair[s]’ and, if so, (2) whether the action was undertaken with ‘authority of law.’ ” [State v. Olsen, 189 Wn.2d 118 , 123, 399 P.3d 1141 (2017)] (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Reeder, 184 Wn.2d 805, 814 , 365 P.3d 1243 (2015)). 12 No.59628-8-II State v. Nelson, ___ Wn.3d ___, 565 P.3d 906 , 916 (2025).

34
State v. Reedergreen
wash · 2015 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Article I, section 7 requires a two-pronged inquiry to determine if a violation has occurred: “(1) whether the contested state action “disturbed” a person’s ‘private affair[s]’ and, if so, (2) whether the action was undertaken with ‘authority of law.’ ” [State v. Olsen, 189 Wn.2d 118 , 123, 399 P.3d 1141 (2017)] (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Reeder, 184 Wn.2d 805, 814 , 365 P.3d 1243 (2015)). 12 No.59628-8-II State v. Nelson, ___ Wn.3d ___, 565 P.3d 906 , 916 (2025).

2025Article I, section 7 requires a two-pronged inquiry to determine if a violation has occurred: “(1) whether the contested state action “disturbed” a person’s ‘private affair[s]’ and, if so, (2) whether the action was undertaken with ‘authority of law.’ ” [State v. Olsen, 189 Wn.2d 118 , 123, 399 P.3d 1141 (2017)] (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Reeder, 184 Wn.2d 805, 814 , 365 P.3d 1243 (2015)). 12 No.59628-8-II State v. Nelson, ___ Wn.3d ___, 565 P.3d 906 , 916 (2025).

14
State v. Nelsongreen
wash · 2025 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025“As to the second prong of the article I, section 7 inquiry, the [urinalysis and breath analysis] testing conditions are supported by “authority of law” if, but only if, they serve ‘a compelling interest, achieved through narrowly tailored means.” Id. at 917.

2025Article I, section 7 requires a two-pronged inquiry to determine if a violation has occurred: “(1) whether the contested state action “disturbed” a person’s ‘private affair[s]’ and, if so, (2) whether the action was undertaken with ‘authority of law.’ ” [State v. Olsen, 189 Wn.2d 118 , 123, 399 P.3d 1141 (2017)] (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Reeder, 184 Wn.2d 805, 814 , 365 P.3d 1243 (2015)). 12 No.59628-8-II State v. Nelson, ___ Wn.3d ___, 565 P.3d 906 , 916 (2025).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (24)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Myrick green
wash · 1984
2 sentences

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ś 227 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers "`those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.'" State v. McKinney, 148 Wash.2d 20, 27 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wash.2d at 511 , 688 P.2d 151 ).

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ¶226 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers “ ‘those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.’ ” State v. McKinney, 148 Wn.2d 20, 32 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wn.2d at 511 ).

42006–2009
McNabb v. Department of Corrections green
wash · 2008
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep’t of Corr., 163 Wn.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008).

2009McNabb v. Dep’t of Corr., 163 Wn.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008).

42009–2009
State v. Jorden green
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

22009–2009
State v. Gunwall green
wash · 1986
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep’t of Corr., 163 Wn.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)).

2009McNabb v. Dep’t of Corr., 163 Wn.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)).

22009–2009
State v. Cheatam green
wash · 2003
2 sentences

2007State v. Cheatam, 150 Wn.2d 626, 642 , 81 P.3d 830 (2003).

2007State v. Cheatam, 150 Wn.2d 626, 642 , 81 P.3d 830 (2003).

22007–2007
State v. McKinney green
wash · 2006
2 sentences

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ś 227 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers "`those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.'" State v. McKinney, 148 Wash.2d 20, 27 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wash.2d at 511 , 688 P.2d 151 ).

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ¶226 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers “ ‘those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.’ ” State v. McKinney, 148 Wn.2d 20, 32 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wn.2d at 511 ).

22006–2006
State v. McKinney green
wash · 2002
2 sentences

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ś 227 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers "`those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.'" State v. McKinney, 148 Wash.2d 20, 27 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wash.2d at 511 , 688 P.2d 151 ).

2006Article I, section 7 is not a device for creating such rights of public recognition. ¶226 An article I, section 7 inquiry considers “ ‘those privacy interests which citizens of [Washington] have held, and should be entitled to hold, safe from governmental trespass.’ ” State v. McKinney, 148 Wn.2d 20, 32 , 60 P.3d 46 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Myrick, 102 Wn.2d at 511 ).

22006–2006
State v. Bowman green
wash · 2021
2 sentences

2026State v. Bowman, 198 Wn.2d 609 , 618, 498 P.3d 478 (2021) (citing State v. Miles, 160 Wn.2d 236, 243 , 156 P.3d 864 (2007)).

2026State v. Bowman, 198 Wn.2d 609 , 618, 498 P.3d 478 (2021) (citing State v. Miles, 160 Wn.2d 236, 243 , 156 P.3d 864 (2007)).

12026–2026
State v. Miles green
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2026State v. Bowman, 198 Wn.2d 609 , 618, 498 P.3d 478 (2021) (citing State v. Miles, 160 Wn.2d 236, 243 , 156 P.3d 864 (2007)).

2026State v. Bowman, 198 Wn.2d 609 , 618, 498 P.3d 478 (2021) (citing State v. Miles, 160 Wn.2d 236, 243 , 156 P.3d 864 (2007)).

12026–2026
State v. Curran red
wash · 1991
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
State v. Rankin green
wash · 2004
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dept. of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008). [4] State v. Rankin, 151 Wash.2d 689, 694 , 92 P.3d 202 (2004). [5] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 510-11 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [6] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [7] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 .

2009McNabb v. Dept. of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008). [4] State v. Rankin, 151 Wash.2d 689, 694 , 92 P.3d 202 (2004). [5] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 510-11 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [6] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [7] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 .

12009–2009
State v. O'CONNOR green
wash · 2005
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
State v. Jamison green
wash · 1980
2 sentences

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

12009–2009
State v. George green
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
State v. Rose neutral
washctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
Robinson v. City of Seattle green
washctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
State v. Meacham green
wash · 1980
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
Palmer v. Jensen green
washctapp · 1996
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
United States v. Dionisio green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
State v. Rose green
washctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009
Matter of Maxfield green
wash · 1997
2 sentences

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

12009–2009
Allen v. United States green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

12009–2009
Hines v. Alabama green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2009Cir.(Va.) 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1271 , 94 L.Ed.2d 132 (1987). [20] Jamison, 93 Wash.2d at 799 , 613 P.2d 776 . [21] In re Maxfield, 133 Wash.2d 332 , 339, 945 P.2d 196 (1997). [22] A claim under article I, section 7 warrants an inquiry on independent state constitutional grounds without the need for a Gunwall analysis.

12009–2009
State v. Berlin green
wash · 1997
2 sentences

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

2009McNabb v. Dep't of Corrections, 163 Wash.2d 393, 399-400 , 180 P.3d 1257 (2008) (citing State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)). [23] State v. Myrick, 102 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 688 P.2d 151 (1984). [24] State v. Jorden, 160 Wash.2d 121, 126 , 156 P.3d 893 (2007). [25] Id. at 127, 156 P.3d 893 . [26] Collins cites State v. Rose, 146 Wash.App. 439 , 191 P.3d 83 (2008) (invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release); Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash.App. 795 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (partially invalidating the city's preemployment dr

12009–2009

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.030 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.703 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 5.60.060 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 13 (2006–2026) NC 3 (2002–2005) IL 2 (1998–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check