Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Houser v. Manninggreen2 sentences2001In so holding, the Fourth District certified conflict with Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307, 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), in which the Third District held that once a defendant violates a bond condition, the question as to whether to grant pretrial release is addressed to the discretion of the trial court without regard to the pretrial detention criteria in section 907.041. 2000See Houser, 719 So.2d at 309 (suggesting that Merdian was litigated on "the unexamined assumption that the only basis for refusing readmission to bond would be if the defendant qualified for pretrial detention under section 907.041."). | 2 | 4 |
Blair v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Blair v. State, 15 So.3d 758, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“A pretrial detention order must contain findings of fact and conclusions of law showing that the constitutional and statutory criteria for pretrial detention are met. 2011Blair v. State, 15 So.3d 758, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), approved, 39 So.3d 1190 (Fla.2010). | 2 | 2 |
Gomez v. Hinckleygreen2 sentences1999As Houser observes, we discussed the statutory and constitutional authority of courts to withhold bail in Gomez v. Hinckley, 473 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). 1992See also Gomez v. Hinckley, 473 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). | 1 | 2 |
Mininni v. Gillumgreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., Mininni, 477 So. 2d at 1015 . 8 The instant case, by contrast, involves the State’s motion for pretrial detention pursuant to section 907.041(5)(d), which is premised upon the second clause of Article I, section 14 of the Florida Constitution: “If no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process, the accused may be detained.” There is nothing in the plain language of 907.041(5)(d), or its procedural counterpart, Florida Rule of Criminal Pro | 1 | 1 |
Resendes v. Bradshawgreen1 sentence2018As such, Mr. Sardinas contends that “[w]hen the State does not file a motion for pretrial detention a court ‘is not authorized to impose pretrial detention.’” Resendes v. Bradshaw, 935 So. 2d 19, 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Paul v. Jennegreen2 sentences2001See Paul, 728 So.2d at 1172 . 2001In determining that Paul qualified for pretrial detention, the trial court relied on section 907.041(4)(b)4.b. and remanded Paul into custody. [4] See Paul, 728 So.2d at 1168 . | 1 | 1 |
Merdian v. Cochrangreen1 sentence1998See 654 So.2d at 575 -76 & n. 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Blair
green
1 sentence2011Blair v. State, 15 So.3d 758, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), approved, 39 So.3d 1190 (Fla.2010). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Nguyen v. State
green
1 sentence2006Precedent emanating from this court, see Nguyen v. State, 925 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), and Griffith v. State, 914 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and from the Second District Court, see Golden v. Crow, 862 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), holds that it is. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Golden v. Crow
green
1 sentence2006Precedent emanating from this court, see Nguyen v. State, 925 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), and Griffith v. State, 914 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and from the Second District Court, see Golden v. Crow, 862 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), holds that it is. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Griffith v. State
green
1 sentence2006Precedent emanating from this court, see Nguyen v. State, 925 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), and Griffith v. State, 914 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and from the Second District Court, see Golden v. Crow, 862 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), holds that it is. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.