Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Spencergreen2 sentences2012Appellant is cautioned that the filing of any future conviction and/or sentencing challenges in this case which attempt to litigate claims previously raised and rejected may result in issuance of an order to show cause and prohibitions under State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999), as well as recommendations of disci plinary sanctions pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2012). 2012Appellant is cautioned once again that the filing of any future conviction and/or sentencing challenges in this case which attempt to litigate baseless claims or claims previously raised and rejected may result in issuance of an order to show cause and prohibitions under State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999), as well as recommendations of disciplinary sanctions pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2012). | 2 | 4 |
Ibarra v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Fails v. State, 137 So.3d 623, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Ibarra v. State, 45 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), for the proposition that a show cause order is not required before imposing sanctions under section 944.279); Cooper v. State, 89 So.3d 979, 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (same). 2014See Ibarra v. State, 45 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (stating that a show cause order is not required for the imposition of sanctions under section 944.279). | 2 | 2 |
Cooper v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Fails v. State, 137 So.3d 623, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Ibarra v. State, 45 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), for the proposition that a show cause order is not required before imposing sanctions under section 944.279); Cooper v. State, 89 So.3d 979, 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Fails v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Fails v. State, 137 So.3d 623, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Ibarra v. State, 45 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), for the proposition that a show cause order is not required before imposing sanctions under section 944.279); Cooper v. State, 89 So.3d 979, 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Jones v. State, 18 So.3d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding inmate’s submission of fabricated factual allegations in petition asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel warranted referral to DOC for appropriate disciplinary procedures). | 1 | 1 |
Hall v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Johnson, 44 So.3d at 200 (noting that a claim need not be repetitive to be frivolous and stating that a court may sanction a prisoner under section 944.279 regardless of the prisoner’s history of filing); accord Hall v. State, 94 So.3d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Falco v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Johnson, 44 So.3d at 200 (noting that a claim need not be repetitive to be frivolous and stating that a court may sanction a prisoner under section 944.279 regardless of the prisoner’s history of filing); accord Hall v. State, 94 So.3d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Yasir v. Hancockgreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Yasir v. Hancock, 868 So.2d 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (defendant seeking review of trial court's recommendation of sanctions under section 944.279 appealed the order that found his pleading frivolous, not the order directing the court to forward the written findings). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nathaniel Brown v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.
green
1 sentence2018After barring Appellant twice, we also warned him that future “violation of this order could result in referral to the Department of Corrections for sanctions under section 944.279, Florida Statutes.” Brown, 221 So. 3d at 1284–85. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.