Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Struble v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchangegreen2 sentences1987Struble v DAIIE, 86 Mich App 245, 251, 255-256 ; 272 NW2d 617 (1978), lv den 406 Mich 885 (1979). 1987Struble v DAIIE, 86 Mich App 245, 251, 255-256 ; 272 NW2d 617 (1978), lv den 406 Mich 885 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ouellette v. Kenealy
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, a party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of earning capacity is not sufficient.” “ ‘Loss of earning capacity’ is what an injured person could have earned but for the injury. ‘Work loss’ is loss of income from work an injured person would have performed if he had not been injured.” Ouellette v Kenealy, 141 Mich App 562, 565 ; 367 NW2d 353 (1984), aff’d 424 Mich 83 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985) (citations omitted). 2015Accordingly, a party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of earning capacity is not sufficient.” “ ‘Loss of earning capacity’ is what an injured person could have earned but for the injury. ‘Work loss’ is loss of income from work an injured person would have performed if he had not been injured.” Ouellette v Kenealy, 141 Mich App 562, 565 ; 367 NW2d 353 (1984), aff’d 424 Mich 83 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985) (citations omitted). | 2 | 1987–2015 |
Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1983In Krawczyk v DAIIE, 117 Mich App 155 ; 323 NW2d 633 (1982), this Court held that $390 paid for health insurance during plaintiff’s injury was not a work loss benefit recoverable under § 3107(b). 1983In Krawczyk v DAIIE, 117 Mich App 155 ; 323 NW2d 633 (1982), this Court held that $390 paid for health insurance during plaintiff’s injury was not a work loss benefit recoverable under § 3107(b). | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2019Under the statute, a no-fault insurer is liable for payment of work-loss benefits “consisting of loss of income from work an injured person would have performed during the first 3 years after the date of the accident if he or she had not been injured.” MCL 500.3107(1)(b). “[A] party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(1)(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of -3- earning capacity is not sufficient.” Davis v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co, 159 Mich App 734, 738 ; 407 NW2d 1 (1987). 2019Under the statute, a no-fault insurer is liable for payment of work-loss benefits “consisting of loss of income from work an injured person would have performed during the first 3 years after the date of the accident if he or she had not been injured.” MCL 500.3107(1)(b). “[A] party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(1)(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of -3- earning capacity is not sufficient.” Davis v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co, 159 Mich App 734, 738 ; 407 NW2d 1 (1987). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ouellette v. Kenealy
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, a party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of earning capacity is not sufficient.” “ ‘Loss of earning capacity’ is what an injured person could have earned but for the injury. ‘Work loss’ is loss of income from work an injured person would have performed if he had not been injured.” Ouellette v Kenealy, 141 Mich App 562, 565 ; 367 NW2d 353 (1984), aff’d 424 Mich 83 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985) (citations omitted). 2015Accordingly, a party seeking work loss benefits under § 3107(b) must show actual loss; a mere loss of earning capacity is not sufficient.” “ ‘Loss of earning capacity’ is what an injured person could have earned but for the injury. ‘Work loss’ is loss of income from work an injured person would have performed if he had not been injured.” Ouellette v Kenealy, 141 Mich App 562, 565 ; 367 NW2d 353 (1984), aff’d 424 Mich 83 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Williams v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences2000In this regard, the trial court ruled that “by continuing to receive worker’s comp, Plaintiff, regardless of the reason that he continued to stay out on comp for several more months, Plaintiff is saying to General Motors that he has a work related injury which doesn’t allow him to return.” Defendant relies on Williams v DAIIE, 169 Mich App 301 ; 425 NW2d 534 (1988), to support its contention in this regard. 2000In this regard, the trial court ruled that “by continuing to receive worker’s comp, Plaintiff, regardless of the reason that he continued to stay out on comp for several more months, Plaintiff is saying to General Motors that he has a work related injury which doesn’t allow him to return.” Defendant relies on Williams v DAIIE, 169 Mich App 301 ; 425 NW2d 534 (1988), to support its contention in this regard. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Oyen
green
1 sentence1994No challenge is presented by this appeal to the *646 ruling in Nawrocki v Hawkeye Security Ins Co, 83 Mich App 135 ; 286 NW2d 317 (1978), that an injured person’s right to work-loss benefits under § 3107(l)(b) is not necessarily limited to the period of his disability. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Nawrocki v. Hawkeye Security Insurance
green
1 sentence1994No challenge is presented by this appeal to the *646 ruling in Nawrocki v Hawkeye Security Ins Co, 83 Mich App 135 ; 286 NW2d 317 (1978), that an injured person’s right to work-loss benefits under § 3107(l)(b) is not necessarily limited to the period of his disability. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Lenart v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
neutral
2 sentences1987Ouelette v Kenealy, 424 Mich 83, 86-87 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985); Lenart v DAIIE, 156 Mich App 669 ; 401 NW2d 900 (1986). 1987Ouelette v Kenealy, 424 Mich 83, 86-87 ; 378 NW2d 470 (1985); Lenart v DAIIE, 156 Mich App 669 ; 401 NW2d 900 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Coates v. Michigan Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1986In Coates v Michigan Mutual Ins Co, 105 Mich App 290 ; 306 NW2d 484 (1981), for example, the Court considered the legitimacy of a truck driver’s claim for work-loss benefits under § 3107. 1986In Coates v Michigan Mutual Ins Co, 105 Mich App 290 ; 306 NW2d 484 (1981), for example, the Court considered the legitimacy of a truck driver’s claim for work-loss benefits under § 3107. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Gobler v. Auto-Owners Insurance
green
2 sentences1986In Gobler v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 139 Mich App 768 ; 362 NW2d 881 (1984), lv gtd 424 Mich 877 (1986), plaintiff sought to recover survivor’s benefits under §3108, rather than work-loss benefits under § 3107. 1986In Gobler v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 139 Mich App 768 ; 362 NW2d 881 (1984), lv gtd 424 Mich 877 (1986), plaintiff sought to recover survivor’s benefits under §3108, rather than work-loss benefits under § 3107. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Farquharson v. Travelers Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1983Krawczyk v DAIIE, 117 Mich App 155 ; 323 NW2d 633 (1982); Farquharson v Travelers Ins Co, 121 Mich App 766 ; 329 NW2d 484 (1982). 1983Krawczyk v DAIIE, 117 Mich App 155 ; 323 NW2d 633 (1982); Farquharson v Travelers Ins Co, 121 Mich App 766 ; 329 NW2d 484 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.