Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Peek v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). 2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
Romine v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). 2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Ramirezgreen2 sentences2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). 2003Nor did he commit them during “ “ ‘ a relatively short period of time in what can be fairly viewed as one continuous course of criminal conduct.’ ” ” State v. Ramirez, 178 Ariz. 116, 130 , 871 P.2d 237, 251 (1994), quoting Romine v. State, 251 Ga. 208 , 305 S.E.2d 93, 99 (1983), quoting Peek v. State, 239 Ga. 422 , 238 S.E.2d 12, 19 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Rogovichgreen2 sentences2003Cf. State v. Rogovich, 188 Ariz. 38, 44 , 932 P.2d 794, 800 (1997) (upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”); State v. Lacy, 187 Ariz. 340 , 929 P.2d 1288 (1996) (multiple homicide victims under § 13-703(F)(8)). 2003Cf. State v. Rogovich, 188 Ariz. 38, 44 , 932 P.2d 794, 800 (1997) (upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”); State v. Lacy, 187 Ariz. 340 , 929 P.2d 1288 (1996) (multiple homicide victims under § 13-703(F)(8)). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Crawfordgreen2 sentences2016The 2015 amendment to § 13-105(22)(d) did not change that, but made the general definition of historical prior felony conviction consistent with the sentencing provision in § 13-703(M). ¶ 17 Before 2012, courts addressing whether foreign convictions constituted historical prior felony convictions for enhanced sentencing purposes were required to “first conclude that the foreign conviction includes ‘every element that would be required to prove an enumerated Arizona offense.’” State v. Crawford, 214 Ariz. 129, 131, ¶ 7 , 149 P.3d 753, 755 (2007) (quoting State v. Ault, 157 Ariz. 516, 521 , 759 2016The 2015 amendment to § 13-105(22)(d) did not change that, but made the general definition of historical prior felony conviction consistent with the sentencing provision in § 13-703(M). ¶ 17 Before 2012, courts addressing whether foreign convictions constituted historical prior felony convictions for enhanced sentencing purposes were required to “first conclude that the foreign conviction includes ‘every element that would be required to prove an enumerated Arizona offense.’” State v. Crawford, 214 Ariz. 129, 131, ¶ 7 , 149 P.3d 753, 755 (2007) (quoting State v. Ault, 157 Ariz. 516, 521 , 759 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Aultgreen2 sentences2016The 2015 amendment to § 13-105(22)(d) did not change that, but made the general definition of historical prior felony conviction consistent with the sentencing provision in § 13-703(M). ¶ 17 Before 2012, courts addressing whether foreign convictions constituted historical prior felony convictions for enhanced sentencing purposes were required to “first conclude that the foreign conviction includes ‘every element that would be required to prove an enumerated Arizona offense.’” State v. Crawford, 214 Ariz. 129, 131, ¶ 7 , 149 P.3d 753, 755 (2007) (quoting State v. Ault, 157 Ariz. 516, 521 , 759 2016The 2015 amendment to § 13-105(22)(d) did not change that, but made the general definition of historical prior felony conviction consistent with the sentencing provision in § 13-703(M). ¶ 17 Before 2012, courts addressing whether foreign convictions constituted historical prior felony convictions for enhanced sentencing purposes were required to “first conclude that the foreign conviction includes ‘every element that would be required to prove an enumerated Arizona offense.’” State v. Crawford, 214 Ariz. 129, 131, ¶ 7 , 149 P.3d 753, 755 (2007) (quoting State v. Ault, 157 Ariz. 516, 521 , 759 | 1 | 1 |
Harmelin v. Michigangreen2 sentences1999See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 995 , 111 S.Ct. 2680, 2701 , 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991). ¶ 9 Finally, the court of appeals held that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photographs of the victim because their marginally prejudicial effect did not outweigh their probative value. 1999See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 995 , 111 S.Ct. 2680, 2701 , 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991). ¶ 9 Finally, the court of appeals held that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photographs of the victim because their marginally prejudicial effect did not outweigh their probative value. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gretzlergreen2 sentences1983State v. Gretzler, 135 Ariz. 42 , 659 P.2d 1, 15 (1983). 1983State v. Gretzler, 135 Ariz. 42 , 659 P.2d 1, 15 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lacy
green
2 sentences2003Cf. State v. Rogovich, 188 Ariz. 38, 44 , 932 P.2d 794, 800 (1997) (upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”); State v. Lacy, 187 Ariz. 340 , 929 P.2d 1288 (1996) (multiple homicide victims under § 13-703(F)(8)). 2003Cf. State v. Rogovich, 188 Ariz. 38, 44 , 932 P.2d 794, 800 (1997) (upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”); State v. Lacy, 187 Ariz. 340 , 929 P.2d 1288 (1996) (multiple homicide victims under § 13-703(F)(8)). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Morales
green
1 sentence2023Id. ¶28 Here, the superior court and the parties mistakenly believed that the available sentencing options under A.R.S. § 13-703(A) would lead to the same result. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Califano v. Boles
green
2 sentences1999Califano, 443 U.S. at 292 , 99 S.Ct. 2767 . 1999Califano, 443 U.S. at 292 , 99 S.Ct. 2767 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Bullington v. Missouri
green
2 sentences1985In Rumsey II, we held that the capital sentencing procedure pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-703 was “ ‘like a trial on the issue of guilt or innocence,’ ” State v. Rumsey, 136 Ariz. at 171 , 665 P.2d at 53 , quoting Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 444-45 , *335 101 S.Ct. 1852, 1861 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), and that Rumsey had in effect been acquitted of the aggravating circumstance. 1985In Rumsey II, we held that the capital sentencing procedure pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-703 was “ ‘like a trial on the issue of guilt or innocence,’ ” State v. Rumsey, 136 Ariz. at 171 , 665 P.2d at 53 , quoting Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 444-45 , *335 101 S.Ct. 1852, 1861 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), and that Rumsey had in effect been acquitted of the aggravating circumstance. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Rumsey
green
2 sentences1985In Rumsey II, we held that the capital sentencing procedure pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-703 was “ ‘like a trial on the issue of guilt or innocence,’ ” State v. Rumsey, 136 Ariz. at 171 , 665 P.2d at 53 , quoting Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 444-45 , *335 101 S.Ct. 1852, 1861 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), and that Rumsey had in effect been acquitted of the aggravating circumstance. 1985In Rumsey II, we held that the capital sentencing procedure pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-703 was “ ‘like a trial on the issue of guilt or innocence,’ ” State v. Rumsey, 136 Ariz. at 171 , 665 P.2d at 53 , quoting Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 444-45 , *335 101 S.Ct. 1852, 1861 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), and that Rumsey had in effect been acquitted of the aggravating circumstance. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Rumsey
green
1 sentence1983Id. at 432, 636 P.2d at 1214 . 4 On remand, the trial court held another sentencing hearing under A.R.S. § 13-703 and filed a new special verdict. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.