Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fladger v. Fladgergreen2 sentences2022Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 149 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014); Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 623 (5) (b) ( 723 SE2d 421 ) (2012) (noting that it is well-settled that the written findings required under OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (1) (B) are “mandatory”) (citations omitted). 2022Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 149 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014); Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 623 (5) (b) ( 723 SE2d 421 ) (2012) (noting that it is well-settled that the written findings required under OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (1) (B) are “mandatory”) (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Haesun Park-Poaps v. Richard C. Poapsgreen2 sentences2020But written factual findings are necessary only “[i]f the trial court determines that a deviation from the presumptive child support amount is warranted[.]” Park-Poaps, 351 Ga. App. at 866 (6). 2020But written factual findings are necessary only “[i]f the trial court determines that a deviation from the presumptive child support amount is warranted[.]” Park-Poaps, 351 Ga. App. at 866 (6). | 2 | 2 |
Brogdon v. Brogdongreen2 sentences2022Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 149 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014); Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 623 (5) (b) ( 723 SE2d 421 ) (2012) (noting that it is well-settled that the written findings required under OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (1) (B) are “mandatory”) (citations omitted). 2022Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 149 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014); Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 623 (5) (b) ( 723 SE2d 421 ) (2012) (noting that it is well-settled that the written findings required under OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (1) (B) are “mandatory”) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Kennedy v. Kennedygreen2 sentences2020See Kennedy v. Kennedy, 309 Ga. App. 590, 592-93 (1) (a) & (b) ( 711 SE2d 103 ) (2011) (concerning the need for written findings when a deviation is ordered). 3. 2020See Kennedy v. Kennedy, 309 Ga. App. 590, 592-93 (1) (a) & (b) ( 711 SE2d 103 ) (2011) (concerning the need for written findings when a deviation is ordered). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Wallace v. Wallacegreen2 sentences2015OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2) (E); see Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 147 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014) (explaining that if a trial court determines that a deviation from the presumptive child-support amount is applicable, the court must include written findings of fact under OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2) (E)); Wallace v. Wallace, 296 Ga. 307, 308 (1) ( 766 SE2d 452 ) (2014) (same). 2015OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2) (E); see Fladger v. Fladger, 296 Ga. 145, 147 (2) ( 765 SE2d 354 ) (2014) (explaining that if a trial court determines that a deviation from the presumptive child-support amount is applicable, the court must include written findings of fact under OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2) (E)); Wallace v. Wallace, 296 Ga. 307, 308 (1) ( 766 SE2d 452 ) (2014) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Strunk v. Strunkgreen1 sentence2014While the trial court can certainly deviate from the presumptive amount of child support in a modification action, if it does so, it must “enter a written order specifying the basis for the modification . . . and shall include all of the information set forth in paragraph (2) of subsection (c) of this Code section.” OCGA § 19-6-15 (k) (4). 11 And, as this Court has previously noted, OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2) (E) requires written findings of fact that a deviation applies and the reasons for the deviation, the amount of child support that would have been required if the deviation were not granted, | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Turnergreen1 sentence2013Turner, 285 Ga. at 868 (2). | 1 | 1 |
Carson v. Carsongreen2 sentences2010To the extent that Carson v. Carson, 226 Ga. App. 659, 660 (3) ( 487 SE2d 447 ) (1997) holds otherwise, it is hereby overruled. 2010To the extent that Carson v. Carson, 226 Ga. App. 659, 660 (3) ( 487 SE2d 447 ) (1997) holds otherwise, it is hereby overruled. | 1 | 1 |
Department of Human Resources v. Wilcoxgreen2 sentences2010See also Dept. of Human Resources v. Wilcox, 219 Ga. App. 757, 758 ( 466 SE2d 662 ) (1996) (where no transcript and no written findings pursuant to OCGA § 19-6-15, order modifying child support pursuant to DHR review vacated and case remanded for written findings). 2010See also Dept. of Human Resources v. Wilcox, 219 Ga. App. 757, 758 ( 466 SE2d 662 ) (1996) (where no transcript and no written findings pursuant to OCGA § 19-6-15, order modifying child support pursuant to DHR review vacated and case remanded for written findings). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCarthy v. Ashment-Mccarthy
green
2 sentences2019In McCarthy v. Ashment- McCarthy, 295 Ga. 231 ( 758 SE2d 306 ) (2014), our Supreme Court considered whether the trial court’s failure to comply with the requirement to make written findings under OCGA § 19-6-15 can be waived by failing to first raise the issue of compliance in the trial court. 2019In McCarthy v. Ashment- McCarthy, 295 Ga. 231 ( 758 SE2d 306 ) (2014), our Supreme Court considered whether the trial court’s failure to comply with the requirement to make written findings under OCGA § 19-6-15 can be waived by failing to first raise the issue of compliance in the trial court. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.