Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re J.L.M.green1 sentence2026“The juvenile court’s determination regarding its subject matter jurisdiction implicates a question of law which this Court reviews de novo.” In re J.L.M., 2018-Ohio-2175, ¶ 9 (9th Dist.). {¶18} R.C. 2151.353(G) provides that any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of that section “shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not termin | 1 | 1 |
In Re Covertgreen2 sentences2007See, also, In re Covert (1984), 17 Ohio App.3d 122, 124 , 17 OBR 185, 477 N.E.2d 678 . {¶ 17} Therefore, assuming that the April 18, 2006 judgment entry of the Mercer County Juvenile Court placing the children in the custody of VWCJFS and transferring this matter to Van Wert County was a temporary order of disposition entered pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A), it should be noted that pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(F), this “temporary custody order * * * shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, exc 2007See, also, In re Covert (1984), 17 Ohio App.3d 122, 124 , 17 OBR 185, 477 N.E.2d 678 . {¶ 17} Therefore, assuming that the April 18, 2006 judgment entry of the Mercer County Juvenile Court placing the children in the custody of VWCJFS and transferring this matter to Van Wert County was a temporary order of disposition entered pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A), it should be noted that pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(F), this “temporary custody order * * * shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, exc | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Young Children
green
2 sentences2008We disagree. {¶ 20} R.C. 2151.353 (F) provides for a sunset provision on the issue of continuing agency custody: {¶ 21} "Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not terminate until the court issues a dispositional order under that section." {¶ 22} In In re: Young Children , 76 2007In In re Young Children (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 632 , the Supreme Court of Ohio considered the relationship between the continuing jurisdiction of a juvenile court and the "sunset date" for temporary custody dispositions set forth in R.C. 2151.353 (F), which provides: "Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary cu | 3 | 2007–2011 |
Goldfuss v. Davidson
green
1 sentence2018"As when they apply criminal plain-error review, reviewing courts applying civil plain-error review 'must proceed with the utmost caution, limiting the doctrine strictly to those extremely rare cases where exceptional circumstances require its application to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.' " Id. {¶ 36} R.C. 2151.353(G), "Disposition of abused, neglected, or dependent child," commonly referred to as the sunset provision, states in part: {¶ 37} "Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In re Young Children
green
1 sentence2008We disagree. {¶ 20} R.C. 2151.353 (F) provides for a sunset provision on the issue of continuing agency custody: {¶ 21} "Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not terminate until the court issues a dispositional order under that section." {¶ 22} In In re: Young Children , 76 | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In Re Travis Children
green
2 sentences2007Travis , 80 Ohio App.3d at 624 -625 . {¶ 11} Travis is no longer good law on this issue, however, as it reflected the position taken by some appellate districts before a conflict was certified to the Ohio Supreme Court, which later rejected that view. 2007R.C. 2151.413 (D)(1) provides that if a child has been in the temporary custody of a public children services agencies for 12 or more months of a consecutive 22-month period, "the agency with custody shall file a motion requesting permanent custody of the child." R.C. 2151.353 (F) provides: "Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revis | 1 | 2007–2007 |
In Re McCrary
green
2 sentences1992I, III, IV and V R.C. 2151.353(F) states: “Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this, section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not terminate until the court issues a dispositional order under that section.” This statute is commonly referred to as the sunset provision, because if the juvenile court allows the sun to set 1992I, III, IV and V R.C. 2151.353(F) states: “Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this, section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not terminate until the court issues a dispositional order under that section.” This statute is commonly referred to as the sunset provision, because if the juvenile court allows the sun to set | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.