Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robson v. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASS'Ngreen2 sentences2003Robson v. Electrical Contractors Ass'n Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust , 312 Ill. 2003Robson v. Electrical Contractors Ass’n Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust, 312 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Weilergreen2 sentences2000See In re Marriage of Weiler, 258 Ill.App.3d 454, 461 , 196 Ill.Dec. 372 , 629 N.E.2d 1216 (1994); In re Marriage of Rubinstein, 145 Ill.App.3d 31, 38 , 99 Ill.Dec. 212 , 495 N.E.2d 659 (1986). 2000See In re Marriage of Weiler, 258 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Hobbs
green
2 sentences1991(In re Marriage of Hobbs (1982), 110 Ill. 1988(In re Marriage of Hobbs (1982), 110 Ill. | 2 | 1988–1991 |
In Re Marriage of Hunt
green
1 sentence2013In Hunt, the appellate court held that “an employee spouse’s contractual right to a pension or profit- sharing interest is ‘property’ under section 503 of the [Act], regardless of whether the interest is matured, vested or nonvested, or contributory or noncontributory” and that “[a]ny part of such pension or profit-sharing interest earned by the employee spouse while married is property ‘acquired’ during marriage within the meaning of section 503 and is, therefore, marital property.” Hunt, 78 Ill. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Marriage of Rubinstein
green
2 sentences2000See In re Marriage of Weiler, 258 Ill.App.3d 454, 461 , 196 Ill.Dec. 372 , 629 N.E.2d 1216 (1994); In re Marriage of Rubinstein, 145 Ill.App.3d 31, 38 , 99 Ill.Dec. 212 , 495 N.E.2d 659 (1986). 2000See In re Marriage of Weiler, 258 Ill.App.3d 454, 461 , 196 Ill.Dec. 372 , 629 N.E.2d 1216 (1994); In re Marriage of Rubinstein, 145 Ill.App.3d 31, 38 , 99 Ill.Dec. 212 , 495 N.E.2d 659 (1986). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
In re Marriage of Benz
green
1 sentence1991App. 3d 273, 281-82 , 518 N.E.2d 1316, 1320-21 , indicates the differences between those two methods of distribution: “Decisions of this State have firmly established that pension rights, whether matured, vested, contributory or noncontributory, constitute property ‘acquired’ during the marriage under section 503 of the Act. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.